Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yu Charitable & Educational Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$60kHuman Services$55kEducation$43kArts & Culture$500
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASTRO VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL$1,200
WEALTH BY HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 77% of grant dollars ($123k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 23% that went abroad ($36k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1k → 12%ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $5k → 12%PEACH FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%SHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMYCHINATOWN CORPS: $35k → 10%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $2k → 10%CREEKSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA: $235 → 11%THE PARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF NORTHE: $5k → 12%WEALTH BY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN: $20 → 17%SHI CAI XIA SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%EASTER SEALS: $20 → 14%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $3k → 9%ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH: $200 → 8%AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 → 12%ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $45 → 12%THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMYCHINATOWN CORPS: $5k → 10%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $2k → 10%CREEKSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA: $140 → 11%SAINT MARK'S SCHOOL: $2k → 14%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $3k → 9%THE SALVATION ARMYCHINATOWN CORPS: $5k → 10%SAINT MARK'S SCHOOL: $1k → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $5k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMYCHINATOWN CORPS: $5k → 10%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $3k → 10%DR SUN YAT-SEN OAKLAND FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%CASTRO VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
DC

Beyond the US: 23% of all-years giving ($36k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
China$36k · 6 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 10 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$105k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+27%

Still filing today

40%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’25
HealthPhilanthropyInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue +33%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +40%
  • PC
    PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $375 · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • GP
    GONG-NIAN PRIMARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • SC
    SHI CAI XIA CHUNG XIN MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • GP
    GONG-NING PRIMARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
2
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
3
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc

To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives

Health
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
6
Diabetes Technology Society

To facilitate research into the treatment, monitoring, diagnosis and prevention of diabetes.

Health
7
Association of Migraine Disorders
Health
8
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
9
Curepsp Inc

To raise awareness, build community, improve care and find a cure for psp, cbd and msa.

Health
10
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

We will cure ms while empowering people affected by ms to live their best lives.

Health
11
The Foundation for Aids Research

Amfar is dedicated to ending the global aids epidemic through innovative research. (see schedule o)

Health
12
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Heart Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shin Shin Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMYCHINATOWN CORPS: $49,400 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCHINATOWN CORPSGONG-NIAN PRIMARY SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherGONG-NIAN PRIMARY SCHOOLSHI CAI XIA CHUNG XIN MIDDLE SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherSHI CAI XIA CHUNG XIN MIDDLE SCHOOLGONG-NING PRIMARY SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherGONG-NING PRIMARY SCHOOLAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEA: $8,000 · OtherAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEAAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $7,100 · OtherAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIONST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $5,045 · OtherPARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5,000 · Other+10 more: $12,315 · Other+10 moreAmerican Diabetes Association: $12,500 · HealthAmerican Diabetes As…American Heart Association Inc: $10,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Assoc…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,100 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PEACH FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationSHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · International
Other$121,860Health$29,100Philanthropy$5,000Education$2,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE PEACH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC: $375 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds THE PEACH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yu Charitable & Educational Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yu Charitable & Educational Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yu Charitable & Educational Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Yu Charitable & Educational Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yu Charitable & Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph