How much did YOUTH ON THEIR OWN grant in FY2022?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of YOUTH ON THEIR OWN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

healthenhanceseerio

2022

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$50k–250k1 grant · $96k

$12,000

Median grant

States reached

$20M

Total assets

Largest grants

OUR FAMILY SERVICES INC$96,000
I AM YOU$12,000
EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION$10,000
AMPHI FOUNDATION$8,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$191k · 4 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$191k

$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%

+63%

Still filing today

100%

86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OF
OUR FAMILY SERVICES INC
2× · 2021–2022 · $106k · revenue +30%
EE
EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION
2× · 2021–2022 · $45k · revenue +37%
IA
I AM YOU
2× · 2021–2022 · $22k · revenue +233%

Funded once

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +8%
ER
EL RIO FOUNDATION - MANNING HOUSEgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +176%
PC
PIMA COUNTY SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT
one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Arizona Latino Leaders in Education

We exist to ensure that individuals from the communities most impacted by education inequities are the ones making decisions for all students

Education

Education Forward Arizona

Advocate for and act on edu. improvements that advance the quality of life for all arizonans

—

Tucson Museum of Art

The tucson museum of art and historic block connects art to life through meaningful, engaging experiences that inspire discovery, spark creativity, and promote cultural understanding.

Arts & Culture

Tucson Medical Center

Tucson medical center's mission is to deliver caring, personalized, quality healthcare to patients and their families in an environment that is supportive, education-focused and compassionate.

Health

Arizona Youth Partnership

Arizona youth partnership (azyp) builds solid foundations for youth and families by partnering with arizona communities to provide youth services, prevention programs and health education related to substance abuse, homelessness, human…

Health

Arizona Latin-American

Unclassified

Arizona Education Scholarship Foundation

To award scholarships to students who wish to attend private K-12 schools with the support of informed, giving and connected communities of parents, donors and partner organizations.

Education

Arizona Educational Foundation Inc

To celebrate excellence and cultivate equity in prek-12th grade arizona public education.

—

Tucson Youth Development Inc

To equip pima county youth to gain employment, achieve self sufficiency, and reach career potential through education and training.

—

Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans.

Civil Rights

Tucson Values Teachers

Support high quality teachers. raise public awareness of the value of the teaching profession.

Employment

Southern Arizona Leadership

Business leaders commit skills & resources to enhance the region's quality of life & economic climate

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is I Am You 360. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

9/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$154,000Education$65,000Human Services$22,000Philanthropy$10,000Health$10,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation ForAZ24.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation For · Arizona Community Foundation · Marshall Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Social Venture Partners Tucson · The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona · Community Food Bank Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation YOUTH ON THEIR OWN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: METRO EDUCATION COMMISSION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 860670259 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on METRO EDUCATION COMMISSION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Youth on Their Own?

Find your warmest path to Youth on Their Own through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

YOUTH ON THEIR OWN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Youth on Their Own?

More from the funding graph

YOUTH ON THEIR OWN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Youth on Their Own?

More from the funding graph