Skip to content

· Private foundation

Young Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$53kCrime & Legal$37kHealth$32kFood & Nutrition$28kHousing & Shelter$24kYouth Development$22kInternational$20kHuman Services$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$746k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACLU FOUNDATIONS$6,500
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$5,500
CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING$3,000
I SUPPORT THE GIRL$3,000
OUR TOWN ST HELENA$2,500
BOYS AND GIRLS ST HELENA$2,500
POST$2,000
ABORTION CARE NETWORK$2,000
SF COMMUNITY CLINIC CONSORTIUM$2,000
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$1,000
CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OUR TOWN ST HELENA: $3k → 9%OUR TOWN ST HELENA: $3k → 9%OUR TOWN ST HELENA: $3k → 9%OUR TOWN ST HELENA: $3k → 9%OUR TOWN ST HELENA: $1k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION NAPA VALLEY: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$237k · 19 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$237k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+7%

Still filing today

58%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium
    4× · 2019–2022 · $21k · revenue +21%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $19k · revenue +65%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • TP
    TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -1%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +7%
  • PO
    PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +106%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

—
5
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
6
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
7
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
8
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
9
San Francisco Chamber of Commerce

To attract, develop, and retain business in san francisco.

—
10
California Fire Safe Council Inc

To lead california communities in wildfire risk reduction and resiliency.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
12
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tipping Point Community; the most unlike its peers is Peninsula Open Space Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAPA VALLEY FOOD BANK: $28,000 · OtherNAPA VALLEY FOOD BANKSan Francisco Community Clinic Consortium: $20,500 · OtherSan Francisco Community Clinic ConsortiumAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONACLU FOUNDATIONS: $13,500 · OtherACLU FOUNDATIONSHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $11,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYI SUPPORT THE GIRL: $9,000 · OtherI SUPPORT THE GIRLCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $8,600 · OtherCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATIONBOYS AND GIRLS ST HELENA: $8,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS ST HELENASF COMMUNITY CLINIC CONSORTIUM: $8,500 · OtherSF COMMUNITY CLINIC CONSORTIUMPOST: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $7,000 · OtherEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $36,500 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVEAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES …OUR TOWN ST HELENA: $12,500 · Human ServicesOUR TOWN S…For the Girls Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesFor the Gi…COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $2,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 · InternationalTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $4,900 · Food & NutritionABORTION CARE NETWORK: $3,000 · Health
Other$139,600Civil Rights$55,500Human Services$22,000International$15,000Philanthropy$5,000Food & Nutrition$4,900Health$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $36,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Community Clinic Consortium: $20,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR TOWN ST HELENA: $12,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $11,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $8,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFor the Girls Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $4,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABORTION CARE NETWORK: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR TOWN ST HELENA ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds For the Girls Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
  • Who funds ABORTION CARE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Young Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Young Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Young Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph