Skip to content

· Public charity

York Rotary Charitable Endowment Fund

To provide financial assistancer to crippled, disabled, disadvantage adn abused children of york county, pa and to provide financial assistance to post secondary students from york county, pa who are furthering their education in or outside of york county, pa.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$87kEnvironment$73kPublic Benefit$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$41kHealth$37kCommunity Improvement$29kYouth Development$29kFood & Nutrition$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $57,580, the rows itemized in this filing. The $140,030 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $82,450 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$19,880
GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF$8,500
POSITIVE ENERGY ARTS$8,000
RAINBOW ROSE CENTER$7,700
FAMILY FIRST HEALTH$7,500
THE ADVANTAGE PROGRAM$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILD CARE CONSULTANTS: $16k → 9%YMCA OF THE ROSES: $6k → 9%YMCA YORK AND YORK COUNTY: $6k → 9%child care consultants inc: $5k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF YORK: $5k → 9%LATINOS UNIDOS OF YORK: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $26k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$26k · 100% · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$233k · 11 repeat orgs$393k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
24

Total granted

$233k
$385k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+1%

Still filing today

73%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN INC
    2× · 2017–2022 · $21k · revenue +471%
  • YC
    YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK
    2× · 2019–2022 · $16k · revenue +79%
  • YO
    YMCA OF THE ROSES
    2× · 2019–2022 · $12k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • MG
    MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS 5000
    one grant, 2024 · $74k
  • CO
    CITY OF YORK - KIWANIS LAKE PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • CO
    COUNTY OF YORK
    one grant, 2019 · $47k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
York Day Nursery Inc

To establish york day early learning as the agency of choice for high quality early childhood education and care to children of working families of all income levels throughout york county, pennsylvania.

Education
2
York County Children's Advocacy Center

Our mission is to reduce trauma for children and families through collaboration in child abuse investigations, prevention education, and advocacy.

Crime & Legal
3
York College of Pennsylvania

York college prepares graduates for fulfilling, productive, and purposeful lives by providing high quality programs of study supported by relevant real-world experiences. continued on schedule o.as a rich and diverse community of educators…

Education
4
The Young Women's Christian Association of York Pa

Ywca york is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

—
5
York Community Resource Center

York community resource center equips and uplifts their community through a strong and educated workforce.

Education
6
Fc York

Youth soccer club

—
7
York Hospital

York hospital is a premier community teaching hospital providing quality, cost-effective health care services strongly supporting excellence in education, and offering essential services without regard for an individual's ability to pay.

Health
8
York Academy Regional Charter School

With an unrelenting focus on academic excellence, the york academy regional charter school's mission is to challenge students in a diverse learning environment that opens doors for growth, opportunity and global citizenship.

Education
9
The Lancaster County Partners for Youth
Philanthropy
10
Philadelphia Youth Sports Collaborative

The mission of philadelphia youth sports collaborative (pysc) is to dramatically enhance the capacity of youth-serving organizations in philadelphia to provide high quality, sports-based youth development programs to children in every…

Philanthropy
11
Upper Palmetto Ymca Inc

The upper palmetto ymca continually strives to meet its mission to put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. for 100 years, the upper palmetto ymca has built strong kids,…

Human Services
12
Philadelphia Youth Network Inc

Philadelphia youth network (pyn) equips young people to build lifelong skills, pursue meaningful careers, and embrace change with confidence - so they can thrive in the workforce, experience economic mobility, and strengthen their…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home of York; the most unlike its peers is Equiteam Support Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS 5000: $74,381 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS GRANTS 5000Individual grant recipient: $73,849 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF YORK - KIWANIS LAKE PROJECT: $49,673 · OtherCITY OF YORK - KIWANIS LAKE PROJECTCOUNTY OF YORK: $47,079 · OtherCOUNTY OF YORKTRUMP LAWN AND LAND: $25,894 · OtherTRUMP LAWN AND LANDYORK LITTLE LEAGUE: $20,000 · OtherPOSITIVE ENERGY ARTS: $16,000 · OtherYORK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $16,000 · Other+16 more: $149,343 · Other+16 moreCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $20,882 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE ROSES: $12,000 · Human ServicesLatinos Unidos of York: $5,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF YORK: $5,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION: $15,000 · HealthSUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC: $11,551 · HealthEQUITEAM SUPPORT SERVICES: $10,000 · HealthBEAUMONT ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $21,080 · Community ImprovementNORTH HARTFORD PARTNERSHIP INC F/K/N NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS IN: $5,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterSPARROW PLACE: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterRAINBOW ROSE CENTER: $15,400 · Civil Rights
Other$472,219Human Services$42,882Health$36,551Community Improvement$26,080Public Safety & Disaster$25,000Housing & Shelter$21,000Civil Rights$15,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEAUMONT ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $21,080 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $20,882 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYORK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAINBOW ROSE CENTER: $15,400 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetFAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $12,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUSAN P BYRNES HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC: $11,551 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCRISPUS ATTUCKS ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEQUITEAM SUPPORT SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSPARROW PLACE: $10,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF YORK COUNTY: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTICK N MOVE BOXING INC: $6,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF YORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH HARTFORD PARTNERSHIP INC F/K/N NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS IN: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

York County Community FoundationPA36.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: York County Community Foundation · The Arthur J and Lee R Glatfelter Foundation · Powder Mill Foundation · Kinsley Foundation · The Graham Foundation · White Rose Leadership Institute · United Way of York County · Wellspan Health · Nisource Charitable Foundation · The W Dale Brougher Foundation · Rutters Childrens Charities Inc · Memorial Health Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization York Rotary Charitable Endowment Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from York Rotary Charitable Endowment Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on York Rotary Charitable Endowment’s filings →

    More from the funding graph