Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yocom Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$204k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$198kReligion$60kPhilanthropy$15kRecreation & Sports$13kFood & Nutrition$10kEducation$8k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
SAVING TINY HEARTS SOCIETY$25,000
CYCTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$25,000
BETHESDA TEACHING MINISTRY INC$25,000
CAROL'S KITCHEN$10,000
THE BLESSING CENTER INC$10,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$10,000
SOUTH SHORES BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLORSHIP FUND$8,000
SHOOT FOR A CURE$7,500
KING HIGH SCHOOL WRESTLING BOOSTERS INC$5,000
KING HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL BOOSTERS INC$5,000
AUTISM SPEAKS INC$5,000
INLAND SOCAL UNITED WAY$5,000
INLAND EMPIRE PRESTIGE SOCCER CLUB$3,366
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAROL'S KITCHEN: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
2
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
3
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
PACS1 Syndrome Research Foundation
Health
6
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
7
Diabetes Technology Society

To facilitate research into the treatment, monitoring, diagnosis and prevention of diabetes.

Health
8
The Cure Is Now Inc

To eliminate acquired, congenital and developmental diseases.

Health
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
10
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
11
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Inland Empire Prestige Soccer Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETHESDA TEACHING MINISTRY: $50,000 · OtherBETHESDA TEACHING MINISTRYCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $25,230 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONCYCTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherCYCTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONSOUTH SHORES BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherSOUTH SHORES BAPTIST CHURCHMIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLORSHIP FUND: $8,000 · OtherMIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLORSHIP FUNDKING HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL BOOSTERS INC: $5,000 · OtherKING HIGH SCHOOL WRESTLING BOOSTERS INC: $5,000 · OtherINLAND SOCAL UNITED WAY: $5,000 · OtherMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 · HealthMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DSHOOT FOR A CURE: $7,500 · HealthSHOOT FOR A CUREAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 · HealthSAVING TINY HEARTS SOCIETY: $25,000 · PhilanthropySAVING TINY H…THE BLESSING CENTER INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BLESSING …CAROL'S KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesINLAND EMPIRE PRESTIGE SOCCER CLUB: $3,366 · Recreation & Sports
Other$133,230Health$122,500Philanthropy$35,000Human Services$10,000Recreation & Sports$3,366

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAVING TINY HEARTS SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE BLESSING CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCAROL'S KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOOT FOR A CURE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINLAND EMPIRE PRESTIGE SOCCER CLUB: $3,366 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yocom Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yocom Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yocom Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph