Skip to content
Ylry Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Ylry Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$6.6MPublic Benefit$1.7MYouth Development$493kRecreation & Sports$381kReligion$369kHuman Services$160kArts & Culture$94kPhilanthropy$83kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $64
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $453k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.7M
$91,778
Median grant
2
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGACY HERITAGE BETTER TOGETHER PROGRAM$1,326,088
LEGACY HERITAGE PRESIDE PROGRAM$325,000
LEGACY HERITAGE BETTER TO LEARN$205,567
B'NAI B'RITH CAMP$91,778
NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC$90,244
LEGACY HERITAGE BETTER TO SERVE$65,154
LEGACY HERITAGE INVESTORS I LLC$64
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $45k → 11%HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $14k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF CLEVELAND: $39k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $14k → 14%MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $14k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 6 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
47

Total granted

$8.4M
$1.3M

Still filing today

0%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $182k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LEGACY HERITAGE BETTER TOGETHER PROGRAM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5.6M
  • LH
    LEGACY HERITAGE PRESIDE PROGRAM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.7M
  • LH
    LEGACY HERITAGE BETTER TO LEARN
    3× · 2022–2024 · $644k

Funded once

  • MI
    MERCAVA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -87% · 27% of their budget
  • PI
    PARDES INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH STUDIES
    one grant, 2022 · $209k
  • TS
    THE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $79k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gan Israel Chabad Inc

Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education

Recreation & Sports
2
Camp Young Judaea Midwest Inc

Camp young judaea midwest, inspires jewish children of diverse backgrounds to thrive in a joyful, tight-knit community that is passionate about israel and judaism.

Recreation & Sports
3
The Foundation for Sephardic Camp

Religious overnight summer camp that focuses on the cultivation and preservation of sephardic jewish identity through an immersive camping experience

Religion
4
Camp Solomon Schechter

Camp Solomon Schechter blends Jewish tradition and culture as the foundation of the camp experience; integrates nature and activity to create fun; and embraces the child in every person to foster joy, facilitate friendship, and create…

Recreation & Sports
5
Camp Degel Hatorah Inc

Provides a summer program for jewish boys of high school age. the mission is to continue the camper's religious studies in a relaxed setting while providing recreational opportunities.

Religion
6
Camp Chaverim Inc Dba Reyus

The corporation operates a summer sleep away camp providing campers the opportunity to interact with values of judaism in daily life. the corporation converted from for-profit status to nonprofit status to better carry out charitable and…

Recreation & Sports
7
Camp Morasha Inc

Camp Morasha integrates the best in informal and formal education in all of its programming and activities through a transformative and fun, co-ed, summer experience for Jewish youth. The camp inspires and develops the minds, bodies,…

Religion
8
Yeshivath Gesher

Yeshivath Gesher is a local Jewish School whose primary purposes are to strengthen the religious, moral and intellectual welfare of its members, their families and the community. The Yeshiva also promotes the principles of the Orthodox…

Religion
9
Ramah in the Rockies

The mission of ramah in the rockies is to nurture the character development of jewish youth by providing them the opportunity to challenge themselves physically, intellectually, and spiritually.

Recreation & Sports
10
Jewish Camp and Conference Service Inc

To nurture and strengthen jewish leadership and community through meaningful and active informal jewish camp and retreat experiences, therfore creating a legacy of jewish identity for future generations.

—
11
Camp Bauercrest Inc

To develop and strengthen our campers both on and off the field through sportsmanship, teamwork, achievement and responsibility.

—
12
Camp Ashreinu

Camp Ashreinu is devoted to providing educational and recreational activities for children in a religious environment.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Judaea Sprout Lake Camp Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pittsburgh Kollel Bais Yitzchok. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEGACY HERITAGE BETTER TOGETHER PROGRAM: $5,633,521 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE BETTER TOGETHER PROGRAMLEGACY HERITAGE PRESIDE PROGRAM: $1,694,971 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE PRESIDE PROGRAMLEGACY HERITAGE BETTER TO LEARN: $644,114 · OtherLEGACY HERITAGE BETTER TO LEARNLEGACY HERITAGE BETTER TO SERVE: $409,362 · Other+30 more: $747,264 · Other+30 moreMERCAVA INC: $250,000 · EducationKATZ HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF BOCA RATON INC: $16,602 · EducationCamp Judaea Inc: $12,800 · EducationPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC: $79,350 · PhilanthropyCLEVELAND HILLEL FOUNDATION INC: $6,050 · PhilanthropyThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland: $52,700 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $14,000 · Human ServicesJewish Community Centers of Chicago: $13,600 · Human ServicesCAMP HACHSHARA-MOSHAVA OF NY INC: $14,800 · Recreation & SportsCAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS: $14,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC: $14,000 · Recreation & SportsYOUNG JUDAEA CAMP TEL YEHUDAH INC: $14,000 · Recreation & SportsEDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC: $13,600 · Recreation & SportsCamp Young Judaea Inc: $13,200 · Recreation & SportsJEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CAMPING CORPORATION: $12,400 · Recreation & SportsCAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12,400 · Recreation & SportsB'NAI BRITH MEN'S CAMP ASSOCIATION: $91,778 · Youth DevelopmentSHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentGMILUTH CHASODIM (THE HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION): $41,190 · Public BenefitBNEI AKIVA OF LOS ANGELES: $12,400 · Religion
Other$9,129,232Education$279,402Philanthropy$165,400Human Services$125,300Recreation & Sports$108,400Youth Development$103,778Public Benefit$41,190Religion$12,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCAVA INC: $250,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetB'NAI BRITH MEN'S CAMP ASSOCIATION: $91,778 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC: $90,244 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCHECHTER INSTITUTES INC: $79,350 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland: $52,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT: $45,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGMILUTH CHASODIM (THE HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION): $41,190 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetKATZ HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF BOCA RATON INC: $16,602 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP HACHSHARA-MOSHAVA OF NY INC: $14,800 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS: $14,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE: $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG JUDAEA CAMP TEL YEHUDAH INC: $14,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetYOUNG JUDAEA SPROUT LAKE CAMP INC: $14,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEDEN VILLAGE CAMP INC: $13,600 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJewish Community Centers of Chicago: $13,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Young Judaea Inc: $13,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCamp Judaea Inc: $12,800 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST CAMPING CORPORATION: $12,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12,400 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBNEI AKIVA OF LOS ANGELES: $12,400 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMIDWEST CAMPERS INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCLEVELAND HILLEL FOUNDATION INC: $6,050 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPittsburgh Kollel Bais Yitzchok: $5,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for Jewish…The Harold Grinspoon …Ahba IncClrc IncHlmh IncCombined Jewish Phila…Jewish Communal FundThe Jewish Federation…Gbrg IncJewish Federation of …Board of Jewish Educa…Jewish Federation of …
Foundation for Jewish Camp IncNY47.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Ahba Inc · Clrc Inc · Hlmh Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · Gbrg Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj · Board of Jewish Education Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ylry Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ylry Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • B'nai Brith Men's Camp Association: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ylry Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ylry Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ylry’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home