Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yarim Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$11MEducation$850kArts & Culture$300kHealth$30kHuman Services$10kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $139k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA RAV ISACSOHN SCHOOL$60,000
MASORES BAIS YAAKOV$36,000
YESHIVA TORAH VODAATH$26,000
YESHIVA YAKIR LI$25,000
TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS$24,000
YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH$15,000
CHABAD OF PARKLAND$12,500
LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YESHIVA RAV ISACSOHN SCHOOL: $60k → 14%TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS: $27k → 13%GATEWAYS: $50k → 14%THE PINNACLE: $100k → 20%CONG SONS OF ISRAEL: $36k → 28%YESHIVA YAKIR LI: $25k → 11%BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL NORTH MIAMI BEACH: $720k → 15%CONGREGATION ZICHRON YISROEL CHAIM: $3.0M → 11%YESHIVAS RAV ISACSOHN: $50k → 14%TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS: $25k → 13%GATEWAYS: $50k → 14%KHAL DARKEI NOAM: $36k → 20%CONG SONS OF ISRAEL: $36k → 28%CONGREGATION ZICHRON YISROEL CHAIM: $1.5M → 11%YESHIVAS RAV ISACSOHN: $40k → 14%KEREN ACHEINU BNEI YISROEL: $36k → 20%CONG SONS OF ISRAEL: $30k → 28%YESHIVA RAV ISACSOHN SCHOOL: $40k → 14%YESHIVA DARKEI NOAM: $36k → 14%KHAL TEFILO LEMOSHE: $28k → 14%ADERES BAIS YAAKOV: $200k → 11%YESHIVA SHEARITH HAPLEITAH: $180k → 20%YESHIVA SHEARITH HAPLEITAH: $36k → 20%CONGREGATION TOMCHEI TORAH: $180k → 20%CONG BOBOV - 45: $100k → 20%CONG BOBOV - 45: $100k → 20%CONG BOBOV 45: $100k → 20%CONG BOBOV - 45: $100k → 20%YESHIVA MIR YERUSHALAYIM: $50k → 20%CONGREGATION ZICHRON YISROEL CHAIM: $1.3M → 20%KHAL ICHUD CHASIDIM: $50k → 20%CONGREGATION ZICHRON YISROEL CHAIM: $200k → 20%MIFAL HASHAS: $30k → 20%CONGREGATION & GEMACH ZICHRON SHLOMO: $50k → 20%EZRAS CHASANIM: $50k → 20%SIMCHAT TZION: $100k → 20%YESHIVA TORAH VODAATH: $26k → 20%OHR NAAVA: $300k → 20%TOMCHEI TORAH: $1.1M → 20%MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN: $500k → 20%TOMCHEI TORAH: $360k → 20%TOMCHEI TORAH: $180k → 20%MASORES BEIS YAAKOV: $60k → 20%MASORES BAIS YAAKOV: $50k → 20%MASORES BEIS YAAKOV: $50k → 20%MASORES BAIS YAAKOV: $45k → 20%MASORES BEIS YAAKOV: $45k → 20%MASORES BAIS YAAKOV: $36k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 19 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
28

Total granted

$10M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+23%

Still filing today

11%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CZ
    CONGREGATION ZICHRON YISROEL CHAIM
    4× · 2020–2024 · $6.0M
  • TT
    TOMCHEI TORAH
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.6M
  • MY
    MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN
    2× · 2018–2022 · $506k

Funded once

  • BJ
    BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL NORTH MIAMI BEACH
    one grant, 2022 · $720k
  • ON
    OHR NAAVAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue +871%
  • AB
    ADERES BAIS YAAKOV INC
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc

Yeshiva toras aron is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood nj.

Education
4
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
5
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
6
Bais Yaakov Girls High School of Minneapolis

Providing jewish and secular education for high school aged girls.

Education
7
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
8
Sephardic Bet Yaakov Inc

Providing religious and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Meiras Bais Yaakov Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for high school girls.

Education
11
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
12
Nachlas Bais Yaakov

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary aged school children.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Seg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION ZICHRON YISROEL CHAIM: $6,040,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON YISROEL CHAIMTOMCHEI TORAH: $1,620,000 · OtherTOMCHEI TORAHBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL NORTH MIAMI BEACH: $720,000 · OtherBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL NORTH MIAMI BEACHMESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN: $506,000 · OtherCong Bobov 45: $400,000 · Other+32 more: $2,224,700 · Other+32 moreOHR NAAVA: $300,000 · Religion+1 more: $10,000 · ReligionADERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $200,000 · EducationAUDITORY ORAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $17,500 · EducationBNOS ESTHER MALKA INC: $12,000 · Education+2 more: $12,000 · EducationKeren Acheinu Bnei Yisroel Inc: $36,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SEG FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESER BNAI TORAH: $10,000 · International
Other$11,510,700Religion$310,000Education$271,500Philanthropy$47,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $200,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetKeren Acheinu Bnei Yisroel Inc: $36,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAUDITORY ORAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBNOS ESTHER MALKA INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SEG FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT INSPIRE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESER BNAI TORAH: $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetYESHIVA OHR YEHUDA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHR MEIR UBRACHA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OHR NAAVA ↗
  • Who funds ADERES BAIS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds Keren Acheinu Bnei Yisroel Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUDITORY ORAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds TASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS ESTHER MALKA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY33.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Seg Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Bcg Charitable Foundation · Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation · Astar Foundation Inc · The J W Foundation · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · The Ezra Charitable Trust · Maalot · Jog Family Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yarim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yarim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Tashbar of Lakewood Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Yarim Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Yarim Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yarim’s filings →

More from the funding graph