Skip to content

· Public charity

Y12 Fcu Gives Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to reduce the number of under nourished children in the communities we serve by providing them food, knowledge and resources.

$310k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Youth Development$347kFood & Nutrition$318kReligion$294kHuman Services$172kPhilanthropy$115kHousing & Shelter$97kCommunity Improvement$65kEducation$62kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $238,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $310,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $71,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $135k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$199k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THRIVE$17,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF OAK RIDGE$16,000
CEDARBROOK OUTREACH$15,000
WESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER$15,000
FISH HOSPITALITY PANTRIES$12,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK MOBILE FOOD PANTRY$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TN VALLEY$10,000
OPERATION INASMUCH$10,000
CENTRO HISPANO DE EAST TENNESSEE$10,000
CAMPBELL COUNTY CHILDREN'S CENTER$10,000
SHORA FOUNDATION$10,000
EAST TN HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY$8,000
GROW OAK RIDGE$8,000
MAIN STREET BAPTIST CHURCH$8,000
COMPASSION MINISTRIES$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $10k → 18%FAMILY PROMISE OF BLOUNT COUNTY: $15k → 10%THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF LOUDON COUNTY: $20k → 10%THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF LOUDON COUNTY: $10k → 10%SAFE PLACE: $3k → 12%SMOKEY MOUNTAIN SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 10%COMMUNITY HEALTH OF EAST TENNESSEE: $3k → 20%ADFAC: $10k → 13%ADFAC: $8k → 13%ADFAC: $5k → 13%COMPASSION MINISTRIES: $20k → 12%COMPASSION MINISTRIES: $10k → 12%COMPASSION MINISTRIES: $8k → 12%CENTRO HISPANO DE EAST TENNESSEE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 30 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
24

Total granted

$1.3M
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+66%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL
    6× · 2018–2024 · $155k · revenue +7%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF TENNESSEE VALLEY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $85k · revenue +36%
  • WH
    WESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER CO
    4× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • CS
    CITY SHEPHERDS
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • CB
    CAC BEARDSLEY COMMUNITY FARM
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • AT
    AID TO DISTRESSED FAMILIES OF APPAL COUNTIES
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Child Advocacy Center of Anderson Co Tn

To combat severe physical and sexual abuse and resulting trauma by coordinating and providing services in a child friendly, safe and nurturing environment.

Human Services
2
Casa of the Tennessee Heartland Inc

Provide advocacy for abused and neglected children in juvenile court.

Civil Rights
3
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

—
4
Tennessee Children's Home Inc

Tennessee children's home, inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides a home for neglected and pre-delinquent children who have an unstable family situation and who are beginning to develop problems which cannot be solved in their…

Human Services
5
Casa of East Tennessee Inc

To improve the lives of abused and neglected children through trained volunteers who advocate for safe, permanent, loving homes.

—
6
Williamson County Children's Advocacy Center Inc

To provide a safe place to report child abuse, reduce the emotional trauma for children and non-offending family members, and extend professional services to protect the intergrity of an investigation.

Crime & Legal
7
Court Appointed Special Advocates

To be the voice for children who have been victims of abuse and/or neglect. Our vision is to serve every child in the Cheaha Region by providing them with a caring and competent trained volunteer.

Crime & Legal
8
Volunteer East Tennessee

Volunteer East Tennessee inspires service by equipping organizations and mobilizing volunteers to connect with one another and strengthen communities.

—
9
Hope House of Tennessee Inc

By creating a safe and structured two year residential program the Hope House of Tennessee will aim to equip and empower personal and educational growth economic self-sufficiency and a deeper understanding of Christs unconditional love.

Housing & Shelter
10
Housing Hub

Building homes working families can afford. We are dedicated to: providing new, affordable homes to residents in the South Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee; preparing future and current homeowners to both acquire and maintain a safe and…

Housing & Shelter
11
The Samaritan Center Inc

To meet the basic physical, spiritual, and social need of people in our area using the ministry of Jesus as a model.

Religion
12
Child Advocacy Center of Cullman Inc

Nurturing hope, encouraging health, and promoting healing in troubled families through community collaboration, communication and cooperation

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of East Tennessee Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shora Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK MOBILE FOOD PANTRY: $75,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK MOBILE FOOD PANTRYTHRIVE: $62,000 · OtherTHRIVEFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF OAK RIDGE: $59,400 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF OAK RIDGEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SMOKY MOUNTAINS: $58,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SMOKY MOUNTAINSCEDARBROOK OUTREACH INC: $55,000 · OtherCEDARBROOK OUTREACH INCUNITED WAY CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INC: $50,000 · OtherUNITED WAY CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INCMAIN STREET BAPTIST CHURCH: $48,000 · OtherMAIN STREET BAPTIST CHURCHYWCA: $40,000 · OtherSEVIER COUNTY FOOD MINISTRIES: $38,000 · OtherEAST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $38,000 · OtherCITY SHEPHERDS: $30,000 · Other+26 more: $258,969 · Other+26 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL: $155,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS O…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF TENNESSEE VALLEY: $84,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED O…CAMPBELL COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER: $32,500 · Youth DevelopmentCAMPBELL COUNTY CHIL…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CLINCH VALLEY: $16,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS O…COMPASSION MINISTRIES INC: $38,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASSIO…GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF LOUDON COU: $30,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMA…AID TO DISTRESSED FAMILIES OF APPALACHIAN COUNTIES: $23,000 · Human ServicesAID TO DI…FAMILY PROMISE OF BLOUNT COUNTY: $14,680 · Human ServicesFAMILY PR…ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $10,000 · Human ServicesISAIAH 11…CENTRO HISPANO DE EAST TENNESSEE: $10,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO HI…+3 more: $7,500 · Human Services+3 moreHOSPITALITY PANTRIES INC: $47,000 · Food & NutritionNourish Knoxville Inc: $42,740 · Food & NutritionGROW OAK RIDGE: $18,000 · Food & NutritionWESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER CO: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterKNOXVILLE DREAM CENTER: $6,900 · Housing & ShelterOperation Inasmuch Inc: $65,000 · ReligionCOMPASSION COUNSELING: $3,500 · ReligionSHORA FOUNDATION: $64,500 · Philanthropy
Other$812,869Youth Development$288,500Human Services$133,180Food & Nutrition$107,740Housing & Shelter$81,900Religion$68,500Philanthropy$64,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL: $155,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF TENNESSEE VALLEY: $84,500 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetWESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER CO: $75,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetOperation Inasmuch Inc: $65,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetSHORA FOUNDATION: $64,500 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SMOKY MOUNTAINS: $58,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetHOSPITALITY PANTRIES INC: $47,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNourish Knoxville Inc: $42,740 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetCOMPASSION MINISTRIES INC: $38,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetEAST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $38,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPBELL COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER: $32,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF LOUDON COU: $30,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAID TO DISTRESSED FAMILIES OF APPALACHIAN COUNTIES: $23,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGROW OAK RIDGE: $18,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EAST TENNESSEE INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CLINCH VALLEY: $16,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetINTERFAITH HEALTH CENTER: $16,333 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BLOUNT COUNTY: $14,680 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO HISPANO DE EAST TENNESSEE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKNOXVILLE DREAM CENTER: $6,900 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHARBOURS GATE: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCOMPASSION COUNSELING: $3,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR CLINTON CITY: $3,500 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH OF EAST TENNESSEE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFESPACE INCORPORATED: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSmoky Mountain Service Dogs: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF TENNESSEE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER CO ↗
  • Who funds Operation Inasmuch Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHORA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SMOKY MOUNTAINS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY CLINCH-POWELL VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALITY PANTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Nourish Knoxville Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPBELL COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF LOUDON COU ↗
  • Who funds AID TO DISTRESSED FAMILIES OF APPALACHIAN COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds GROW OAK RIDGE ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EAST TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CLINCH VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BLOUNT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO HISPANO DE EAST TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds BLOSSOM CENTER FOR CHILDHOOD EXCELLENCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Tennessee FoundationTN51.8× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Tennessee Foundation · Thompson Charitable Foundation · Trinity Health Foundation of East Tennessee · United Way of Greater Knoxvilleinc · The Clayton Homes Foundation · Gene & Florence Monday Foundation Inc · Variety of Eastern Tennessee · Akima Club Inc · Haslam Family Foundation Inc · Battelle Memorial Institute · United Way Clinch-Powell Valley Inc · The Aslan Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Y12 Fcu Gives Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Y12 Fcu Gives Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Y12 Fcu Gives’ filings →

    More from the funding graph