Skip to content

Ohio · Private foundation

Xavier-Nichols Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$132k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
Organizations funded FY2023
33%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$60,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 10
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$5k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 33% of the organizations Xavier-Nichols Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 17% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Housing & ShelterRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20233$132k33%
FY20225$112k20%
FY20215$135k40%
FY202010$146k100%
FY20192$3k50%
FY20182$3k50%
FY20173$1kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$214kRecreation & Sports$200kReligion$60kHealth$27kEducation$23kArts & Culture$5kHousing & Shelter$3k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Zelie's Home$212,514411%
Cleveland Rowing Foundation$120,000218%
Spartan Alumni Rowing Association$80,000339%
Orchard Lake Schools Saint Mary S Prep and Polish Institue of Cultur$10,1501n/a
St Joseph Academy$10,0001n/a
Caritas Baby Hospital Foundation$5,0001n/a
Maggie's Place Inc$2,50010%
The Musical Arts Association$2,50010%
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine$2,00010%
John Carroll University$61030%
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Xavier-Nichols Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Zelie's Home$212,514411%
Cleveland Rowing Foundation$120,000218%
Spartan Alumni Rowing Association$80,000339%
Orchard Lake Schools Saint Mary S Prep and Polish Institue of Cultur$10,1501n/a
St Joseph Academy$10,0001n/a
Caritas Baby Hospital Foundation$5,0001n/a
Maggie's Place Inc$2,50010%
The Musical Arts Association$2,50010%
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine$2,00010%
John Carroll University$61030%
Province of St Joseph of the Capuchin Order Inc$5001n/a
Honduran Childrens Rescue Fund$5001n/a

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($85k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Xavier-Nichols Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Xavier-Nichols Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Xavier-Nichols Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Xavier-Nichols Foundation

How much does Xavier-Nichols Foundation give?
Xavier-Nichols Foundation reported 3 grants totaling $132,000 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Xavier-Nichols Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Human Services (40%), Recreation & Sports (38%), Religion (11%).
Who are Xavier-Nichols Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Zelie's Home ($213k), Cleveland Rowing Foundation ($120k), Spartan Alumni Rowing Association ($80k).
Does Xavier-Nichols Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Xavier-Nichols Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Xavier-Nichols Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Xavier-Nichols Foundation based?
Xavier-Nichols Foundation is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Xavier-Nichols’ filings →

More from the funding graph