· Private foundation
Wyss Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k30 grants · $140k
- $10k–50k74 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $75,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NSWAS | $40,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL PHYSICIANS FOR THE PR | $35,000 |
| WATER MUSIC SOCIETY | $35,000 |
| MY FRIENDS PLACE | $35,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA | $30,000 |
| REED COLLEGE | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION PORTLAND | $25,000 |
| MULTNOMAH ARTS CENTER | $25,000 |
| LEWIS AND CLARK COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER | $20,000 |
| SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER | $20,000 |
| STREET ROOTS | $20,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OREGON | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $357k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
99 repeat relationships — 79 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK5× · 2021–2025 · $275k · revenue +10%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC5× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +20%- WMWATER MUSIC SOCIETY4× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue +115% · 28% of their budget
Funded once
- OHOregon Historical Society ( for library)one grant, 2021 · $42k
- RCReed College-Lillie P Wyssone grant, 2022 · $35k
- LALewis and Clark College Advancement Services MSC 88one grant, 2023 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Pfm operates world-class farmers markets that contribute to the success of local food growers and producers and create vibrant community gatherings. as a trade association, success for our vendors is our primary objective. listening and…
Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
Open signal's mission is to nurture the change-making power of community media in service of a just and equitable world.
Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.
Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…
Guided by compassion, collaboration and respect, our house provided oregon and southwest washington's only integrated continuum of health and housing services to people with hiv.
Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…
House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Path Home and the most unlike its peers is Water Music Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds WATER MUSIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds REED INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds Central City Concern ↗
- Who funds STREET ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC ↗
- Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SISTERS OF THE ROAD INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR A HUNGER FREE OREGON ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SAM DAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Proud Ground ↗
- Who funds SMART READING ↗
- Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of Hopewell House dba Hopewell House ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Autzen Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · Juan Young Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wyss Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northwest Youth Corps — 100% of income from government
- On-the-Move Community Integration — 81% of income from government
- Hacienda Community Development Corporation — 48% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Janus Youth Programs Inc — 46% of income from government
- Outside in — 33% of income from government
- Portland Street Medicine — 32% of income from government
- Partners for a Hunger Free Oregon — 31% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 29% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
- Human Solutions Inc Dba Our Just Future — 17% of income from government
- Self Enhancement Inc — 14% of income from government
- Proud Ground — 11% of income from government
- Oregon Historical Society — 10% of income from government
- Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- Neighborhood Health Center — 9% of income from government
- Impact Nw — 8% of income from government
- Community Transitional School — 7% of income from government
- New Narrative — 6% of income from government
- Growing Gardens — 6% of income from government
- Ride Connection Inc — 4% of income from government
- Join — 4% of income from government
- Bodyvox Inc — 3% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Lewis & Clark College — 2% of income from government
- Portland Opera Association Inc — 2% of income from government
- Metroeast Community Media — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- Friends of Chamber Music — 1% of income from government
- Reed Institute — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- North Pole Studio — 0% of income from government
- Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc — 0% of income from government
- David's Harp 930771871 — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wyss Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Wyss Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.