How much does Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation give?

Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation reported 13 itemized grants totaling $203,094, out of $228,630 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 11 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.

What does Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (94%), Youth Development (4%), Arts & Culture (2%).

Who are Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Ivinson Memorial Hospital ($74k), St John's Health Foundation ($73k), Wyoming Game & Fish Department ($73k).

Does Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 27% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Where is Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation based?

Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation is based in WY.

Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation

Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation

Q: Which funders back the same organizations as Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Wyoming Community Foundation, The Leona M and Harry B Helmsley Charitable Trust, Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network.

The wbci aims to raise awareness and fund breast cancer programs in wyoming with an emphasis on increasing breast health education, financially assisting breast cancer screenings, facilitating patient navigation, and promoting survivor services through fundraising efforts across the state, proceeds remain in wyoming to grant into…

$229k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$30k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$680kYouth Development$26kArts & Culture$16k

02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 13 grants below total $203,094, the rows itemized in this filing. The $228,630 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,536 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $12k
$10k–50k11 grants · $191k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$731k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
WYOMING CANCER PROGRAMS	$30,000
HORSE WARRIORS	$26,450
WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE	$22,000
ST JOHN'S HEALTH	$19,300
JOHNSON COUNTY HEALTHCARE CENTER	$18,392
GILLETTE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH	$16,000
IVINSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL	$15,000
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL SWEETWATER CNTY	$12,150
CHEYENNE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER	$12,000
SHERIDAN COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL	$10,000
NORTHWEST WYOMING FAMILY PLANNING	$10,000
NEW COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION	$6,000
ARK REGIONAL SERVICES INC	$5,802

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$618k · 16 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$618k

$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%

+32%

Still filing today

56%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

IM
IVINSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
4× · 2021–2024 · $74k · revenue +45%
SJ
St John's Health Foundation
4× · 2020–2024 · $73k · revenue +482%
SC
SHERIDAN COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
2× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +52%

Funded once

UC
UNITA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH
one grant, 2023 · $23k
NW
NORTHEAST WYOMING COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue +32%
SL
SOUTH LINCOLN HOSPITAL DISTRICT
one grant, 2021 · $15k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Montana Healthcare Foundation

Philanthropy

Wyoming Health Resources Network Inc

To improve and enhance rural health services and promote healthier individuals and communities in wyoming.

Health

Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health

Wyoming County Healthcare Center Ii

Health

Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care

Health

Rocky Mountain Health Foundation

Health

The Colorado Health Foundation

Health

Central Wyoming Hospice & Transitions

To companion the end of life journey with skill and compassion.

—

Jefferson County Memorial Hospital Inc

Promote and provide quality healthcare for the general commuinty of Jefferson County

Health

Wyoming Community Hospital Foundation

To raise funds on behalf of the wyoming county community hospital.

—

Teton Valley Health Care Foundation

Teton Valley Health Care Foundation strives to build mutually beneficial relationships with community members, businesses, and guests that, through their generosity, support a healthy and thriving valley. (Continued on Schedule O). Through…

Health

Sweet Grass Community Health Care Foundation

The sweet grass community health care foundation is in existence to provide support and donations to the medical facilities in the community of big timber montana.

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cheyenne Regional Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ark Regional Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

7/12

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$281,422Health$277,303Human Services$90,000Philanthropy$35,510Youth Development$26,450Housing & Shelter$11,409

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community FoundationWY23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · The Leona M and Harry B Helmsley Charitable Trust · Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network · Developmental Preschool and Day Care · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Wyoming Breast Cancer Initiative’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home