· Private foundation
Wyandotte Health Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $370k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+1 grant · $505k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TURNER HOUSE CHILDREN'S CLINIC | $505,000 |
| SWOPE HEALTH SERVICES | $190,000 |
| MERCY & TRUTH MEDICAL MISSIONS | $145,000 |
| KANSAS CITY KS PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $125,000 |
| UNIFIED GOVERNMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $121,720 |
| PHARMACY OF GRACE | $90,000 |
| EL CENTRO INC | $85,000 |
| KC MEDICAL SOCIETY | $85,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY | $77,500 |
| KANSAS CITY KS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS | $70,000 |
| WYANDOT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK | $50,000 |
| THE FAMILY CONSERVANCY | $50,000 |
| RACIAL EQUITY COLLABORATIVE | $50,000 |
| KUMC RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC | $35,000 |
| CORNERSTONES OF CARE | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $979k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $354k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSWOPE HEALTH SERVICES9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +102%
- WBWYANDOT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC6× · 2019–2025 · $883k · revenue +76%
- TFTHE FAMILY CONSERVANCY7× · 2018–2025 · $781k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- SBSouthwest Boulevard Family Health Cone grant, 2017 · $220k
- UGUnified Government Health Departmenone grant, 2017 · $177k
- HCHealthy Campus Wyandotteone grant, 2017 · $175k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.
Nurture kc is a community collaboration dedicated to reducting infant mortality and improving family health. we work together to change policy for broad impact, transform systems to improve health outcomes at a local level, and provide…
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
KC Asylum Clinic, Inc. (ACKC - the Organization), was founded in Missouri as a nonprofit corporation in 2015 and received its designation as a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization in 2017. The Organization is a non-profit legal services…
Our mission is to create an environment where all citizens can live safely and have access to real opportunities.
To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.
The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.
Providing innovative research, message guidance, communication training, communication expertise,and collaborative strategies to aligned organizations to grow their capacity and improve collaborationand coordination among partner groups in…
The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas City Care Clinic and the most unlike its peers is Stitching Change Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 23. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SWOPE HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds WYANDOT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Family Health Care Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MERCY & TRUTH HEALTHCARE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN ON THE MOVE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO INC ↗
- Who funds PHARMACY OF GRACE INC ↗
- Who funds PACES INC ↗
- Who funds AVENUE OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds TURNER HOUSE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds KC Healthy Kids ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Racial Equity Collaborative ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE NETWORK OF KANSAS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · The Reach Healthcare Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · John W and Effie E Speas Memorial Trust · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Shumaker Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wyandotte Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.