Skip to content
Wx Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Wx Inc

To promote the advancement of women in commercial real estate; to enhance public perception about the role of women in the industry; and to promote the highest standards of professionalism, ethics, and integrity in the field.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.0MEmployment$105kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
$12,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NYU)$52,500
NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL$52,000
COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL$34,500
PROJECT DESTINED$30,000
NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN (NEW)$25,000
UNNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (UPENN)$12,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$12,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$12,000
ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW$7,500
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$5,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY: $10k → 13%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN (NEW): $25k → 17%BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL: $15k → 20%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY: $12k → 28%PROJECT DESTINED: $30k → 14%YALE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 12%NORTHWESTERN: $25k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - BUSINESS SCHOOL: $20k → 16%MIT: $20k → 8%UNNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (UPENN): $12k → 22%NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN (NEW): $25k → 17%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY: $10k → 28%PROJECT DESTINED: $25k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - BUSINESS SCHOOL: $10k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $12k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 22%NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN (NEW): $25k → 17%MANHATTAN COLLEGE: $8k → 28%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 22%NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN (NEW): $25k → 17%HARVARD: $10k → 8%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $50k → 17%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $35k → 17%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $30k → 17%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $20k → 17%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $20k → 17%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $17k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NYU): $71k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NYU): $53k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NYU): $40k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NYU): $25k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NYU): $20k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY (NYU): $20k → 17%CITY COLLEGE OF NY (CCNY): $54k → 17%CITY COLLEGE OF NY (CCNY): $42k → 17%CITY COLLEGE OF NY (CCNY): $30k → 17%CITY COLLEGE OF NY (CCNY): $30k → 17%HUNTER COLLEGE: $10k → 17%CITY COLLEGE OF NY (CCNY): $18k → 17%NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $52k → 17%NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $30k → 17%NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $10k → 17%NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $10k → 17%NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$737k · 7 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$737k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
0%

Still filing today

71%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    New York University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $229k · revenue +45%
  • NY
    NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2025 · $112k · revenue +14%
  • NE
    NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN
    5× · 2020–2025 · $105k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • Northwestern University
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • Cornell Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +46%
  • BL
    BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
The New School

The new school's mission is to prepare our students to understand, contribute to, and succeed in a rapidly changing society, and thus make the world a better and more just place. (continued on schedule o)

Education
11
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
12
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University; the most unlike its peers is Nontraditional Employment for Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

New York University: $228,500 · EducationNew York UniversityTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $171,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORKNEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $112,000 · EducationNEW YORK LAW SCHOOLPROJECT DESTINED INC: $60,000 · EducationPROJECT DESTINED INCTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $52,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $32,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $30,000 · Education+9 more: $104,500 · Education+9 moreCity college of New York: $174,000 · OtherCity college of New Yo…RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIV…HUNTER COLLEGE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $10,000 · OtherSAINT JOHNS PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherNONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN: $105,000 · EmploymentNONTRADITI…Northwestern University: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsREAL ESTATE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL INC: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Education$790,500Other$234,000Employment$105,000Recreation & Sports$25,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew York University: $228,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $171,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $112,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN: $105,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT DESTINED INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $52,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $32,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetManhattan University: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREAL ESTATE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBERNARD M BARUCH COLLEGE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
National Philanthropic TrustPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wx Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wx Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wx’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home