· Private foundation
WWJD FOUNDATION CO Piaker & Lyons PC
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BROOME COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES | $12,000 |
| THE IMPACT PROJECT | $10,000 |
| SAMARITAN HOUSE | $5,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME | $2,500 |
| THE GOODWILL THEATRE | $1,000 |
| GREEN BERET FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC | $1,000 |
| UHS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| FRANCIS HOUSE | $1,000 |
| MERCY HOUSE | $1,000 |
| ROBERSON MUSEUM | $1,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY | $500 |
| SEPP INC FOUNDATION | $500 |
| CHARITY NAVIGATOR | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBroome County Council of Churches6× · 2019–2024 · $72k · revenue +110%
- GTGoodwill Theatre Inc4× · 2019–2024 · $32k · revenue +27%
- LHLOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC2× · 2019–2021 · $11k · revenue +125%
Funded once
- TJTHE JACK KEMP FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -69%
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +151%
- BCBINGHAMTON CITY SCHOOLSone grant, 2021 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is the mission of good samaritan hospice to affirm life in the midst of illness and grief. we accomplish this objective by providing quality patient care, family support, community education and counseling services through an…
To enable people to live with dignity and hope while coping with loss and terminal illness.
The mission of hospice of holland is to provide the most compassionate and highest quality end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual support.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.
The mission of the baptist home of philadelphia is dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals regardless of their…
To strengthen the capacity of local united ways through their charitable human service activities to be leaders in achieving results that improve the lives of all new yorkers.
Mercy hospital foundation,inc. is a charitable, not-for-profit 501(c) 3 corporation with the purpose of raising new funds and stewarding resources which support, improve and promote the care and services provided by mercy hospital of…
The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…
To promote hospice and palliative care in all settings and advocate for quality end of life care.
The mission of the Oswego Health Foundation is to raise and manage philanthropic support for Oswego Health and its not for profit entities as they provide accessible, quality care and improve the health of the residents in our community.
To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy House of the Southern Tier Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Broome County Council of Churches ↗
- Who funds Goodwill Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds THE IMPACT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds LOURDES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE JACK KEMP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds GREEN BERET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Tim Lee Ministries ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC ↗
- Who funds Broome County Urban League Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HEADACHE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SEPP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George a and Margaret Mee Charitable Foundation Inc · Security Mutual Life Foundation · Bgm Foundation · Dr G Clifford & Florence B Decker Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · The Bel-Eve Family Fund · Ruthanne Koffman Charitable Foundation · The Victor& Esther Rozen Foundation Inc · The Stewart W & Willma C Hoyt Foundation Inc · Put God First Foundation · Miller S & Adelaide S Gaffney Fdn · Conrad & Virginia Klee Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization WWJD FOUNDATION CO Piaker & Lyons PC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.