Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wrobel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$362k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.1MHuman Services$151kReligion$75kPhilanthropy$55kYouth Development$54kScience & Tech$30kArts & Culture$30kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $163k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$15,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$125,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$55,000
MACKENZIE'S MISSION$25,000
YOUNG HEARTS FOUNDATION$20,000
MAKE A WISH FDN$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
PARKINSONS FOUNDATION$15,000
MEMORIAL PANCREATIC FOUNDATION$15,000
CHARLIES FUND$15,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$13,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$10,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$5,000
GARY SINESE FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALLIANCE FOR FERTILITY PRESERVATION: $5k → 9%CAMP KESEM: $2k → 14%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%ALLIANCE FOR FERTILITY PRESERVATION: $5k → 9%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%THE YOUNG CENTER: $10k → 14%ALLIANCE FOR FERTILITY PRESERVATION: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 26 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
7

Total granted

$2.6M
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+97%

Still filing today

54%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $343k · revenue +177%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $260k · revenue +78%
  • MM
    MACKENZIES MISSION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • J
    JAFCO
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • SC
    SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
6
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
7
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
8
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
9
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc

To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives

Health
10
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parkinson's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mackenzies Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $750,000 · OtherLUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETYMEMORIAL PANCREATIC FOUNDATION: $339,000 · OtherMEMORIAL PANCREATIC FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $139,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $85,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FDN: $75,072 · OtherCCALS: $75,000 · Other+13 more: $278,000 · Other+13 morePARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $342,500 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $260,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL …MACKENZIES MISSION: $115,000 · HealthMACKENZIES MISSIONALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $66,245 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDE…CHARLEY'S FUND INC: $30,000 · Health+5 more: $75,500 · Health+5 moreALLIANCE FOR FERTILITY PRESERVATION INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $10,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem National: $2,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 · InternationalGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,741,072Health$889,245Human Services$37,000International$10,000Philanthropy$5,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $342,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $260,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMACKENZIES MISSION: $115,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $66,245 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLEY'S FUND INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR FERTILITY PRESERVATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetFIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRAIN FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MACKENZIES MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLEY'S FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR FERTILITY PRESERVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BRAIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wrobel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wrobel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wrobel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph