Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wow We Care Charity of Wisconsin Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20242025.

Health$28kAnimals$5kPhilanthropy$4kFood & Nutrition$4kHousing & Shelter$3kHuman Services$3kCrime & Legal$2kArts & Culture$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$27k
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$51k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOLUTIONS RECOVERY$25,000
FOOD & FARM EXPLORATION CENTER$10,000
GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY$3,000
FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WI$2,000
PORTIAS PURPOSE$2,000
CASA OF THE FOX CITIES$1,500
FOX VALLEY MEMORY PROJECT$1,500
HEAR IN THE FOX CITIES$1,000
KAUKAUNA GIRLS BASKETBALL ASSN$1,000
SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
WOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE FOX VALLEY$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
OSHKOSH AREA HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
COTS INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%CASA OF MARATHON COUNTY: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12k · 5 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$12k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
0%

Still filing today

60%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionAnimalsArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    South Wood County Humane Society Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue -58%
  • CI
    COTS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue -2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOPE HIGHWAY DOG RESCUE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • NP
    NEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kishwaukee United Way

To improve lives by sharing community resources

Philanthropy
2
Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Pantry of Waukesha County Inc

The food pantry serving waukesha county provides food, hope, and dignity to county residents in need, and advocates to increase awareness of hunger through community partnerships.

4
Humane Animal Welfare Society of Waukesha County Inc

The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.

Animals
5
Dodge County Humane Society Inc

Humane society providing animal stray service and animal care including adoptions, redemptions, and surrenders for residents located in dodge county, wi and surrounding areas.

Animals
6
Underdog Pet Rescue of Wisconsin Inc

Underdog pet rescue is an all-breed companion animal rescue and vet clinic based out of dane county, wisconsin. our mission is to find permanent homes for animals in need and to enrich lives by strengthening the connection between animals…

Animals
7
Oconto Area Humane Society & Animal Shelter Inc

Oconto area humane society is an open-admission shelter dedicated to providing protection, care and shelter for abandoned and homeless campanion animals

Animals
8
Oshkosh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.

9
Family Promise of Waukesha County Inc

Our mission is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Housing & Shelter
10
Community Shares of Wisconsin Inc

Community shares of wisconsin (csw), together with its donors and approximately 70 member nonprofits, addresses social, economic, and environmental problems through grassroots activities, advocacy, research and public education.

11
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
12
Family Sharing of Ozaukee County Inc

To alleviate hunger and promote self-sufficiency with dignity and compassion to low-income, elderly and disabled residents of Ozaukee County.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the Fox Cities Inc and the most unlike its peers is African Heritage Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCrisis Support & Recovery S…Fox Valley Grantmaking Foun…Youth Sports ProgramsDisability Services & Suppo…Youth Development Organizat…Early Childhood Care CentersNature Education & Recreati…Animal Shelter and Rescue
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%8%<5yr15%15%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr13%23%20–35yr15%15%35–55yr20%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr13%63%20–35yr15%11%35–55yr20%4%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
7%
197/2,749

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
9/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOLUTIONS RECOVERY INC — $25,000 · HealthSOLUTIONS RECOVERY INCFox Valley Memory Project Inc — $1,500 · HealthFox Valley Memory Project Inc+2 more — $1,000 · HealthFOOD & FARM EXPLORATION CENTER — $10,000 · OtherFOOD & FARM EXPLORATION CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $2,010 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPORTIAS PURPOSE INC — $2,000 · OtherPORTIAS PURPOSE INCMIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE FOX VALLEY — $2,000 · OtherMIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE FOX VALLEYTHE HOPE HIGHWAY DOG RESCUE — $1,150 · OtherCASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC — $1,500 · Other+21 more — $12,472 · Other+21 moreSouth Wood County Humane Society Inc — $3,000 · AnimalsOSHKOSH AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC — $1,000 · AnimalsGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $3,000 · PhilanthropyFOX CITIES FESTIVAL OF LIGHTS INCORPORATED — $1,000 · PhilanthropyFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $2,000 · Food & NutritionOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC — $1,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC — $600 · Food & NutritionCOTS INC — $2,919 · Housing & ShelterWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF MARATHON COUNTY INC — $500 · Human Services
Health$27,500Other$31,132Animals$5,000Philanthropy$4,000Food & Nutrition$3,600Housing & Shelter$2,919Human Services$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSouth Wood County Humane Society Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOTS INC — $2,919 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE — $1,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAUKAUNA GIRLS BASKETBALL ASSOC INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA COMMUNITY PANTRY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERVIEW GARDENS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOSHKOSH AREA HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S IMAGINARIUM INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVEY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPIERINGS CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BUILDING FOR KIDS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI32.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · J J Keller Foundation Inc · Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Theda and Tamblin Clark Smith Family Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Jek Foundation Inc · Abbybank Foundation Inc · Basic Needs Giving Partnership Inc · Oshkosh Corporation Foundation Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wow We Care Charity of Wisconsin Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wow We Care Charity of Wisconsin Inc?

Find your warmest path to Wow We Care Charity of Wisconsin Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph