Skip to content
Worlds Attic Thrift Shop Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Worlds Attic Thrift Shop Inc

Raise funds through sales of items contributed and funds solicited from general public

$171k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$327kReligion$158kYouth Development$4kHuman Services$4kHousing & Shelter$2kHealth$1kPhilanthropy$700Animals$100
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $152,020, the rows itemized in this filing. The $170,871 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,851 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$152,020
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENNONITE CENTRAL COM$152,020
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GATOR WILDERNESS CAMP: $2k → 9%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $100 → 10%GATOR WILDERNESS CAMP: $2k → 9%MANASOTA SOLVE INC: $811 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$486k · 4 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
11

Total granted

$486k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+24%

Still filing today

75%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesReligionInternationalPhilanthropyHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GW
    GATOR WILDERNESS CAMP SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $4k · revenue +56%
  • RT
    RADIO TRAINING NETWORK INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $3k · revenue +34%
  • RC
    REMNANT CHURCH OF SARASOTA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • AF
    Agape Flights Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -34%
  • MOTHERS HELPING MOTHERS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -7%
  • G6
    GALATIANS 62 INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crisis Pregnancy Center of Gainesville Inc

To offer help and hope to women and men with unplanned pregnancy, pregnancy decisions and other life challenges.

Health
2
Sav-a-Life Inc

Helping men & women embrace the truth of god's word as they make life-affirming decisions about their unborn child.

Human Services
3
Starkville Pregnancy Care Center

Christ centered ministry whose mission is to promote a culture for life within our community by serving people facing unexpected pregnancies, and to empower men and women to make wise choices by promoting the benefits of healthly relations…

Human Services
4
Confidential Care Mobile Ministry

To rescue preborn babies from abortion and love their moms into the kingdom.

Civil Rights
5
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
6
Samaritan Health & Wellness Center Inc

The mission of the samaritan health and wellness center, inc. is to reclaim the healing ministry of jesus christ by providing affordable, professional primary health care and counseling for the working uninsured and under insured in lee…

Health
7
Care Net Manasota Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

To meet the physical, emotional, and spiritual challenges of women facing an untimely pregnancy, and minister to men and women based on their needs.

Health
8
Gainesville Community MinistryInc

Gainesville Community Ministry provides help and hope to families and individuals in crisis.

Human Services
9
Stillwater Life Services Inc

To promote a christ-centered view of life and sexuality by offering hope and healing to women, men, and their families so they are enabled to make positive, life-affirming choices.

—
10
Pregnancy Care Center of Lagrange Inc

Pregnancy care center of lagrange is a christ-centered ministry providing medical and educational services to those facing unplanned pregnancies, encouraging sexual integrity, and empowering individuals to make life affirming choices.

Health
11
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
12
Pregnancy Resource Clinic of Clark County Inc

The pregnancy resource clinic is a christ-centered organization that provides trusted care, support, and resources to all people regarding pregnancy and sexual health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Pregnancy Clinics Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grant Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE U S: $476,902 · OtherMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE U S+2 more: $1,882 · OtherRADIO TRAINING NETWORK INC: $3,443 · ReligionREMNANT CHURCH OF SARASOTA INC: $2,068 · ReligionGALATIANS 62 INC: $1,600 · ReligionGATOR WILDERNESS CAMP SCHOOL INC: $3,902 · Human ServicesSELAH FREEDOM INC: $996 · Human ServicesMANASOTA-SOLVE INC: $811 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesAgape Flights Inc: $2,108 · International+1 more: $50 · InternationalMOTHERS HELPING MOTHERS INC: $2,000 · Community ImprovementALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $700 · PhilanthropySARASOTA MEDICAL PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $479 · Health
Other$478,784Religion$7,111Human Services$5,809International$2,158Community Improvement$2,000Philanthropy$700Health$479

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGATOR WILDERNESS CAMP SCHOOL INC: $3,902 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRADIO TRAINING NETWORK INC: $3,443 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAgape Flights Inc: $2,108 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREMNANT CHURCH OF SARASOTA INC: $2,068 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMOTHERS HELPING MOTHERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGALATIANS 62 INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PREGNANCY CLINICS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSELAH FREEDOM INC: $996 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANASOTA-SOLVE INC: $811 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARASOTA MEDICAL PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $479 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Gulf Coast Community …The Bill & Ann Temple…Msc Foundation IncManatee Community Fou…Natl Christian Charit…The Tillie Jennie & H…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Chicago Community…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…
The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co IncFL25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Bill & Ann Templeton Foundation Inc · Msc Foundation Inc · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Tillie Jennie & Harold Schwartz Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Worlds Attic Thrift Shop Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Worlds Attic Thrift Shop Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 53%
  • Selah Freedom Inc: 53% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Worlds Attic Thrift Shop Inc?

Find your warmest path to Worlds Attic Thrift Shop Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $216k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Worlds Attic Thrift Shop’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home