Skip to content

· Public charity

World Oilman's Tennis Tournament

Encourage camaraderie and establish friendships while helping to forge strong business relationships throughout the far-reaching petroleum industry.

$100k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Recreation & Sports$36kEducation$14kHuman Services$13kYouth Development$10kHealth$8k
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $58,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $100,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $41,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$142k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPRING SPIRIT$10,000
NATIONAL JR TENNIS & LEARNING NETWORK$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS TEXAS$10,000
CAMP FOR ALL FOUNDATION$7,500
THE SALVATION ARMY$7,000
SMALL STEPS NURTURING CENTER$7,000
CRISTO REY JESUIT$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL JR TENNIS LEAGUE: $8k → 9%SALVATION ARMY: $6k → 14%NATIONAL JR TENNIS & LEARNING NETWORK: $10k → 7%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $8k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMY: $7k → 14%SMALL STEPS NURTURING CENTER: $7k → 16%CRISTO REY JESUIT: $7k → 16%SPRING SPIRIT: $10k → 16%CAMP FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
2
San Antonio Tennis Association

Develop and promote the lifetime sport

—
3
Usta Texas Section

Growing tennis inclusively to promote and inspire healthier people while serving texas communities.

—
4
Central Texas Tennis Association

Present and teach tennis, primarily to inner city kids yet allowing opportunity for all kids to participate; and many do. We teach tennis, but our main focus is on the total development of our youth. We try to instill the many attributes…

Recreation & Sports
5
Tennis Club of San Antonio

Tennis Club of San Antonio (TCSA) is a non-profit diversity and inclusion organization devoted to promoting diversity in tennis in the San Antonio area all while bringing people together to make a difference in the community and lives of…

Recreation & Sports
6
Donkor Tennis & Education Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
7
Texas Premier Soccer Club

Texas Premier Soccer Club is a nonprofit organization committed to providing affordable, high-level soccer training and competitive opportunities for youth players through coaching, league play, tournaments, camps, and community-based…

Recreation & Sports
8
The Cincinnati Tennis Foundation

Cincinnati Tennis Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to using racquet sports and educational opportunities to build Life Champions. We are committed to growing racquet sports in the region and creating lifelong…

Recreation & Sports
9
United States Tennis Association Inc

Guided by the belief that lives can be transformed through the game of tennis USTA Chicago a District of the USTA Midwest Section creates sustains and grows enthusiasm for the game of tennis throughout Chicagoland. As the governing body…

—
10
Southern Tennis Association Inc

Growing tennis to inspire healthier people and communities everywhere.

—
11
Usc - United Soccer Clubs

The mission of the United Soccer Clubs (USC) is to provide an exceptional platform for youth soccer in South Texas. We aim to elevate the game of soccer by fostering player, coach, and referee development, promoting parent education,…

Recreation & Sports
12
Texas Terrapins Swim Team

To foster national amateur sports competition, sponsor and develop a nationally ranked aquatic team, and further the interest and education of children and parents in competitive aquatic sports.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston Tennis Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is United States Tennis Association Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $18,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INCSpringSpirit Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSpringSpirit IncSPRING BRANCH TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSPRING BRANCH TENNIS ASSOCIATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY: $13,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYUNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $8,000 · OtherUNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIAT…Small Steps Nurturing Center: $7,000 · EducationSmall Steps Nurturi…Cristo Rey Jesuit Houston Foundation: $7,000 · EducationCristo Rey Jesuit H…Camp For All Foundation: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentCamp For A…
Recreation & Sports$38,000Other$21,000Education$14,000Youth Development$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSpringSpirit Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPRING BRANCH TENNIS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetUNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp For All Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSmall Steps Nurturing Center: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCristo Rey Jesuit Houston Foundation: $7,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization World Oilman's Tennis Tournament funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from World Oilman's Tennis Tournament. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to World Oilman's Tennis Tournament?

    Find your warmest path to World Oilman's Tennis Tournament through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on World Oilman's Tennis Tournament’s filings →

    More from the funding graph