Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Workforce Development Council Snohomish County

Workforce snohomish invests government and private funding to continuously increase the global competitiveness and prosperity of our businesses and workforce, to fill current and emerging jobs, and to provide full employment.

$6.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SNOHOMISH COUNTY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $4,285,957 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,144,157 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,858,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $68k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $988k
  • $250k+5 grants · $3.2M
$184,273
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAREER PATH SERVICES$1,858,139
COCOON HOUSE$453,280
PACIFIC ASSOCIATES$363,855
SNOHOMISH COUNTY$293,464
LATINO EDUCATIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE$261,717
NW INNOVATION RESOURCE CENTER$233,564
SEATTLE JOBS INITIATIVE$184,273
TRAC ASSOCIATES INC$168,119
BUSINESS IMPACT NW$147,700
MILLENNIA MINISTRIES$131,134
REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES NORTHWEST$122,713
HOWELL CONSULTING$25,499
REFUGEE EMPOWERMENT HUB$22,500
SNOHOMISH COUNTY LABOR COUNCIL$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES: $65k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 18 repeat orgs$34M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1250

Total granted

$21M
$33M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+34%

Still filing today

50%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $731k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CAREER PATH SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6.6M · revenue +80%
  • RI
    REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES NORTHWEST
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +196%
  • VO
    Volunteers of America Western Washington
    3× · 2021–2023 · $889k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • PA
    PROPELLER AIRPORTS PAINE FIELD LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
  • ET
    EXOTIC TOOL WELDING
    one grant, 2021 · $832k
  • GM
    GLOBAL MACHINE WORKS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $832k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Workforce Development Council Snohomish County

Workforce snohomish invests government and private funding to continuously increase the global competitiveness and prosperity of our businesses and workforce, to fill current and emerging jobs, and to provide full employment. our…

Education
2
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
3
Cowlitz Economic Development Council

Foster Growth in the Community

4
Snohomish County-Camano Association of Realtors

Representing real estate agents and brokers in Snohomish County and Camano Island, Washington, the Association provides its members with resources, education, and support to help them excel in their careers and serve their clients…

5
Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council

Swwdc's mission is to prepare and promote a skilled and adaptive workforce for a thriving economy in southwest washington. swwdc and its community partners provide job search assistance, education and training to individuals and assist…

Philanthropy
6
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
7
Economic Alliance Snohomish County Center for Business and Employment Dev

To foster job development, education, and training relevant to economic development in snohomish county.

8
Spokane Area Workforce Development Council

The SWC mobilizes partnerships, data-driven innovation,and strategic investment to build an equitable workforce ecosystem where every individual can access opportunity, every business can find talent, and every community can thrive.

Community Improvement
9
Economic Opportunity Institute

Equip the public and public decision-makers with the policy research and practical tools they need to embed the values of fairness, care, and opportunity into the foundations of Washington's economy.

Community Improvement
10
Se Works Inc

Se works' mission is to strengthen the economic health and well being of our diverse community by facilitating successful connections between job seekers and employers.

Employment
11
Pacific Northwest Economic Region Foundation

To increase the economic well-being and quality of life for all citizens of the region; to coordinate provincial, territorial, and state policies throughout the region; to identify and promote "models of success and to serve as a conduit…

12
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Refugee & Immigrant Services Northwest and the most unlike its peers is North Central Il ArtWorks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%14%<5yr13%0%5–10yr22%18%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr13%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr22%5%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%69%35–55yr13%7%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.1% lost their exemption, against 21% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.1%1/1,252
the rest of the field
21%
402/1,926

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 1,274 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT — $3,482,544 · OtherEMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENTEQUUS WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS — $1,819,095 · OtherEQUUS WORKFORCE SOLUTIONSREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES NORTHWEST — $1,624,012 · OtherREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES NORTHWESTPACIFIC ASSOCIATES — $1,280,116 · OtherPROPELLER AIRPORTS PAINE FIELD LLC — $1,000,000 · OtherVolunteers of America Western Washington — $888,886 · Other+184 more — $16,234,275 · Other+184 moreCAREER PATH SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING — $6,633,421 · EmploymentCAREER PATH SERVICES E…SEATTLE JOBS INITIATIVE — $574,747 · EmploymentSEATTLE JOBS INITIATIV…COCOON HOUSE — $1,530,993 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING HOPE — $926,076 · Housing & ShelterNORTHWEST INNOVATION RESOURCE CTR — $388,937 · Community ImprovementSEATTLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND BUSINESS IMPACT NW — $147,700 · Community ImprovementLATINO EDUCATIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE — $261,717 · EducationMILLENNIA MINISTRIES — $131,134 · Crime & LegalPIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC — $64,719 · Human ServicesCommunity Foundation of Snohomish County — $28,325 · Philanthropy
Other$26,328,928Employment$7,208,168Housing & Shelter$2,457,069Community Improvement$536,637Education$261,717Crime & Legal$131,134Human Services$64,719Philanthropy$28,325

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAREER PATH SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING — $6,633,421 over 4y, 14% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES NORTHWEST — $1,624,012 over 6y, 15% of budgetCOCOON HOUSE — $1,530,993 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetHOUSING HOPE — $926,076 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetVolunteers of America Western Washington — $888,886 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSEATTLE JOBS INITIATIVE — $574,747 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetNORTHWEST INNOVATION RESOURCE CTR — $388,937 over 3y, 12% of budgetPIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC — $64,719 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAFL-CIO SNOHOMISH & ISLAND COUNTY LABOR COUNCIL — $60,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetECONOMIC ALLIANCE SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $53,790 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Snohomish County — $28,325 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAREER PATH SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES NORTHWEST
  • Who funds COCOON HOUSE
  • Who funds HOUSING HOPE
  • Who funds Volunteers of America Western Washington
  • Who funds SEATTLE JOBS INITIATIVE
  • Who funds NORTHWEST INNOVATION RESOURCE CTR
  • Who funds LATINO EDUCATIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Economic Alliance Snohomish CountyWA28.8× affinity20 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Economic Alliance Snohomish County · The Whitehorse Foundation · Evertrust Foundation · Workforce Development Council Seattle-Ki · North Sound Accountable Community of Health · Ndc Housing & Economic Development Corporation - Group Return · United Way of Snohomish County · Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Ventures · Building Changes · Hubbard Family Foundation · Hazel Miller Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Workforce Development Council Snohomish County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1274 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph