Skip to content

· Public charity

Workforce Development Board of Flagler and Volusia Counties Inc

To be the premier organization for employment and training solutions to the businesses and workforce of volusia and flagler counties.

$5.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$28MHealth$2.1MYouth Development$1.7MEducation$416kHuman Services$359kPublic Benefit$121k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $4,075,311, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,990,866 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $915,555 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$666,069
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASE MANAGEMENT INC$1,361,824
CAREER STEPS INC$1,141,685
ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC$666,069
BREVARD WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC$577,658
FLAGLER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD$328,075
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $858k → 12%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $831k → 12%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES: $706k → 12%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $677k → 12%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $667k → 12%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $666k → 12%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $654k → 12%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $647k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31M · 12 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$31M
$439k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $578k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesEmploymentPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CG
    CATALYST GLOBAL YOUTH INITIATIVES
    3× · 2021–2023 · $203k · revenue +17% · 57% of their budget
  • VR
    VOLUSIA RECOVERY ALLIANCE INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $178k · revenue +364%
  • MA
    MR AND MS MENTORING INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $177k · revenue +10% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • ST
    SASO TRAINING SOLUTIONS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $284k
  • IW
    IAM WRIGHT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $78k
  • ST
    STRENGTH TO ELEVATE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $78k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stroud Development Group

We are a Youth Mentoring program

—
2
Florida Mentoring Network Inc

Florida mentoring network empowers young people ages 13 to 25 through a proven process of growth, connection, and skill building. we believe in "trusting the process"a journey where consistent mentoring, meaningful relationships, and…

Education
3
Elevations Youth Development Outreach Inc

Embrace, educate and encourage our youth

Youth Development
4
Mentoring Young Minds

Mentoring Young Minds inspires, educates and empowers youth with a focus on academic, social-emotional skills and physical activites through mentoring, leadership, and life skills development, while building relationships with positive…

Youth Development
5
D E S T I N E D to Succeed Inc

Youth Family Development for Grades 7-12 - After School Empowerment

Youth Development
6
Youth Impact Alliance

Empowers young individuals

Youth Development
7
Isee a Better You

To be a bridge supporter for girls going from grade to grade and level to level in the educational system as they journey through the course of life in every field of life as entrepreneur career and education with certified leadership and…

—
8
Urban Youth Ministry of Greater Indianapolis Inc

Youth

—
9
Redemption Academy Inc

Mentoring troubled youths

—
10
Pathways in Education Inc
Education
11
The Gifted and Purposed Alliance

To inspire the youth to uncover

Youth Development
12
Philadelphia Health Services Inc

Mentoring and educational programs for female youth

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Volusia Flagler; the most unlike its peers is Catalyst Global Youth Initiatives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASE MANAGEMENT INC: $13,395,638 · OtherCASE MANAGEMENT INCCAREER STEPS INC: $8,661,209 · OtherCAREER STEPS INCGEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER FOUNDATION INC: $1,573,020 · OtherGEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $1,180,004 · OtherECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $5,706,271 · Human ServicesECKERD YOUTH ALTERN…UNITED WAY OF VOLUSIA-FLAGLER COUNTIES INC: $600,000 · PhilanthropyBREVARD WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $577,658 · EmploymentSISTER'S BUILD NETWORK FOR GIRLS INC: $215,879 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF VOLUSIA FLAGLER: $176,685 · Youth DevelopmentSTRENGTH TO ELEVATE INC: $77,500 · Youth DevelopmentMR AND MS MENTORING INC: $177,247 · EducationTHE CHILES ACADEMY INC: $99,545 · EducationCATALYST GLOBAL YOUTH INITIATIVES: $202,650 · Public BenefitVOLUSIA RECOVERY ALLIANCE INC: $177,610 · Health
Other$24,809,871Human Services$5,706,271Philanthropy$600,000Employment$577,658Youth Development$470,064Education$276,792Public Benefit$202,650Health$177,610

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $5,706,271 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF VOLUSIA-FLAGLER COUNTIES INC: $600,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBREVARD WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $577,658 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCATALYST GLOBAL YOUTH INITIATIVES: $202,650 over 3y, 57% of budgetVOLUSIA RECOVERY ALLIANCE INC: $177,610 over 3y, 14% of budgetMR AND MS MENTORING INC: $177,247 over 2y, 31% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF VOLUSIA FLAGLER: $176,685 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetTHE CHILES ACADEMY INC: $99,545 over 2y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF VOLUSIA-FLAGLER COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BREVARD WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTER'S BUILD NETWORK FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST GLOBAL YOUTH INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds VOLUSIA RECOVERY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MR AND MS MENTORING INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF VOLUSIA FLAGLER ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILES ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds STRENGTH TO ELEVATE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Workforce Development Board of Flagler and Volusia Counties Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Workforce Development Board of Flagler and Volusia Counties Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc: 19% of income from government
  • The Chiles Academy Inc: 4% of income from government
  • United Way of Volusia-Flagler Counties Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Workforce Development Board of Flagler and Volusia Counties’ filings →

More from the funding graph