· Public charity
Workforce Development Board of Flagler and Volusia Counties Inc
To be the premier organization for employment and training solutions to the businesses and workforce of volusia and flagler counties.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF FLAGLER AND VOLUSIA COUNTIES INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $4,075,311 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,990,866 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $915,555 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CASE MANAGEMENT INC | $1,361,824 |
| CAREER STEPS INC | $1,141,685 |
| ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC | $666,069 |
| BREVARD WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC | $577,658 |
| FLAGLER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD | $328,075 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $578k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CGCATALYST GLOBAL YOUTH INITIATIVES3× · 2021–2023 · $203k · revenue +17% · 57% of their budget
- VRVOLUSIA RECOVERY ALLIANCE INC3× · 2021–2023 · $178k · revenue +212%
- MAMR AND MS MENTORING INC2× · 2022–2023 · $177k · revenue +10% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- STSASO TRAINING SOLUTIONS INCone grant, 2017 · $284k
- IWIAM WRIGHT INCone grant, 2023 · $78k
- STSTRENGTH TO ELEVATE INCone grant, 2023 · $78k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are a Youth Mentoring program
Florida mentoring network empowers young people ages 13 to 25 through a proven process of growth, connection, and skill building. we believe in "trusting the process"a journey where consistent mentoring, meaningful relationships, and…
Embrace, educate and encourage our youth
Mentoring Young Minds inspires, educates and empowers youth with a focus on academic, social-emotional skills and physical activites through mentoring, leadership, and life skills development, while building relationships with positive…
Youth Family Development for Grades 7-12 - After School Empowerment
Empowers young individuals
To be a bridge supporter for girls going from grade to grade and level to level in the educational system as they journey through the course of life in every field of life as entrepreneur career and education with certified leadership and…
Youth
Mentoring troubled youths
To inspire the youth to uncover
Mentoring and educational programs for female youth
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Volusia Flagler and the most unlike its peers is Catalyst Global Youth Initiatives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF VOLUSIA-FLAGLER COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds BREVARD WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds SISTER'S BUILD NETWORK FOR GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds CATALYST GLOBAL YOUTH INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds VOLUSIA RECOVERY ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds MR AND MS MENTORING INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF VOLUSIA FLAGLER ↗
- Who funds THE CHILES ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds STRENGTH TO ELEVATE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Workforce Development Board of Flagler and Volusia Counties Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc — 19% of income from government
- The Chiles Academy Inc — 4% of income from government
- United Way of Volusia-Flagler Counties Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.