Skip to content
Work Services Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Work Services Corporation

The organization's mission is to empower people with disabilities to achieve personal growth and independence, and to improve their quality of life through training and employment.

$258k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$105kRecreation & Sports$100kEmployment$96kHuman Services$63kCommunity Improvement$20kReligion$6kHousing & Shelter$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $229,688, the rows itemized in this filing. The $257,738 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,050 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $151k
$44,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$79M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MSU FOUNDATION$100,000
PARK PLACE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$50,510
RIDER BAND-ORCHESTRA PARENTS ASSOCIATION$44,000
WSC ICARE FUND$24,378
INTEFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES$10,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%INTEFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES: $11k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$413k · 4 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +685% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$413k
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+685%
+44%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthReligionCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Midwestern State University Foundation Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $205k · revenue +685%
  • PP
    PARK PLACE CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    2× · 2021–2025 · $101k
  • WI
    WSC ICARE FUND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $87k

Funded once

  • BL
    BEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $96k · revenue -21%
  • KI
    KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL WICHITA FALLS UNIVERSITY KIWANIS CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +44% · 58% of their budget
  • KF
    KMOC FM
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita Falls University Kiwanis Foundation Inc
—
2
City of Wichita Employees Friendship Fund

Administer employee contributions for assistance.

Philanthropy
3
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
4
Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation

The mission of the Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation is to enhance the quality of life in the Wichita Falls area through the promotion and support of charitable giving. Our vision is to build strong, vibrant communities inspired by…

Philanthropy
5
Wichita Falls Alliance for Arts and Culture

To provide leadership to support, promote and cultivate the arts in Wichita Falls and the surrounding area. To strengthen and elevate arts and culture including, but not limited to, visual and performing arts, literature, culinary arts,…

Arts & Culture
6
Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc

The mission of the Arts Council is to nurture and strengthen the artistic, cultural and educational quality of the community.

Arts & Culture
7
Wichita County Community Foundation Inc

The wichita county community foundation is a nonprofit, non-sectarian organization dedicated to preserving local wealth so the communities in and around leoti and wichita county will forever remain attractive places to live, work and raise…

Community Improvement
8
First Presbyterian Wichita Foundation Inc

The foundation provides a grant of income to the first presbyterian church of wichita.

Religion
9
Downtown Wichita Falls Development Inc

To educate the populace of Wichita Falls about the benefits of the Downtown area; help attract investors to area; organize events to promote downtown area

Community Improvement
10
Western Kansas Community Foundation

Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.

Philanthropy
11
Wichita Manufacturers Association

Our mission is to advance the manufacturing industry in the region by connecting manufacturers with key resources and promoting the industry.

—
12
Wichita Falls Retirement Foundation

Love and caring are the center of life at Rolling Meadows. Rolling Meadows was founded on the biblical belief that each person's life is a gift from God and is meant to be lived in dignity, comfort and security. Rolling Meadows seeks to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Ministries of Wichita Falls Inc Dba Interfaith Outreach Services; the most unlike its peers is Band Orchestra Parents Assoc of Wichita Falls. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Midwestern State University Foundation Inc: $205,000 · EducationMidwestern State University Foundation IncBAND ORCHESTRA PARENTS ASSOC OF WICHITA FALLS: $44,000 · EducationBAND ORCHESTRA PARENTS ASSOC OF WICHITA FALLSPARK PLACE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $100,510 · OtherPARK PLACE CHRISTIAN CHURCHWSC ICARE FUND: $87,242 · OtherWSC ICARE FUNDKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL WICHITA FALLS UNIVERSITY KIWANIS CLUB: $50,000 · OtherKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL WICHITA FALLS UNIVERSI…+1 more: $5,700 · OtherBEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC: $95,600 · HealthBEACON LIGHTHOUSE…Sheppard Military Affairs Committee: $20,000 · Community ImprovementINTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF WICHITA FALLS INC DBA INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES: $10,800 · Human ServicesWICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $5,600 · Religion
Education$249,000Other$243,452Health$95,600Community Improvement$20,000Human Services$10,800Religion$5,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMidwestern State University Foundation Inc: $205,000 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetBEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC: $95,600 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL WICHITA FALLS UNIVERSITY KIWANIS CLUB: $50,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetBAND ORCHESTRA PARENTS ASSOC OF WICHITA FALLS: $44,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetSheppard Military Affairs Committee: $20,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetINTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF WICHITA FALLS INC DBA INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES: $10,800 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetKMOC FM: $5,700 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $5,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James N McCoy Foundat…Wichita Falls Area Co…Amazonsmile Foundation
James N McCoy FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James N McCoy Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Work Services Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Work Services Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Work Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home