· Public charity
Women in Cable Telecommunications
The wict network develops women leaders who transform our industry.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS GREATER PITTSBURGH CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS GREATER PHILADELPHIA CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS MIDWEST CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS NEW YORK CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS GREATER OHIO CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS VIRGINIA CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SOUTHEAST CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SOUTHWEST CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS HEARTLAND CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS GREATER TEXAS CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS WASHINGTON DCBALTIMORE CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS PACIFIC NORTHWEST CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Grants abroad, by region: $30k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: PROGRAMMING SUPPORT
Stated purpose: PROGRAMMING SUPPORT
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
21 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- WIWOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS5× · 2017–2025 · $65k
- WIWOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS5× · 2017–2025 · $65k
- WIWOMEN IN CABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS4× · 2017–2025 · $55k
Funded once
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
Play a game based on Women in Cable Telecommunications’ filings →