Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Virginia · Public charity

Women in Cable Telecommunications

The wict network develops women leaders who transform our industry.

$230k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
20
Itemized grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$200k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 21
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
17
Total assets, FY2025
$20M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Women in Cable Telecommunications funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving20$200k0%
FY20241$10k0%
FY20231$10k0%
FY202120$200k0%
FY202021$210k0%
FY201721$525kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$585kEmployment$510kCommunity Improvement$50kPhilanthropy$10k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Women in Cable Telecommunications$65,0005n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$65,0005n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Show all 21 grantees
All grantees of Women in Cable Telecommunications by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Women in Cable Telecommunications$65,0005n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$65,0005n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$55,0004n/a
Women in Cable Telecommunications$35,0002n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Women in Cable Telecommunications with peer funders

About Women in Cable Telecommunications

How much does Women in Cable Telecommunications give?
Women in Cable Telecommunications reported 20 itemized grants totaling $200,000, out of $230,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 21 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Women in Cable Telecommunications fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (51%), Employment (44%), Community Improvement (4%).
Who are Women in Cable Telecommunications's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Women in Cable Telecommunications ($65k), Women in Cable Telecommunications ($65k), Women in Cable Telecommunications ($55k).
Does Women in Cable Telecommunications fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Women in Cable Telecommunications?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Women in Cable Telecommunications based?
Women in Cable Telecommunications is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Women in Cable Telecommunications’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home