Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wolohan Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2022
35
Grants FY2022
13
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$1.5MReligion$1.1MEducation$627kHuman Services$452kInternational$209kFood & Nutrition$177kHousing & Shelter$169kRecreation & Sports$165kOther$0
02FY2022 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 35 grants below total $1,604,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,934,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $330,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $395k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $485k
  • $250k+2 grants · $695k
$20,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Holy Cross Foreign Mission Society$400,000
Catholic Relief Services$295,000
Catholic Dioceses of Venice$150,000
Catholic Medical Mission Board$75,000
Field Neurosciences Institute$60,000
Act of Faiths Foundation$50,000
St. Gerard Society$50,000
Alliance for Catholic Education$50,000
University of Notre Dame$50,000
Catholic Extension Society$40,000
Mustard Seed Shelter$30,000
Catholic Relief Services$30,000
Child and Family Services of Michigan$25,000
Foundations and Donors Interested in Catholic Activities$25,000
Saginaw Habitat for Humanity$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SAMARITAS: $50k → 21%EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $6k → 21%COVENANT HOUSE OF MICHIGAN: $25k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
OH
CO
MD
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 21 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
41

Total granted

$2.7M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+91%

Still filing today

33%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $829k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    3× · 2019–2022 · $110k · revenue +43%
  • COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN
    2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +23%
  • A
    AXIS
    2× · 2020–2022 · $35k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • CA
    COVENANT ACADEMIES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $115k · revenue +23%
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $103k
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS FOREIGN MISSIONS
    one grant, 2019 · $102k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
2
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
3
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
4
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Madonna University

The mission of madonna university, a catholic and franciscan institution of higher learning, is to instill in its students christain humanistic values, intellectual inquiry, a respect for university and a committment to serving others…

Education
7
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Omaha Inc

In response to god's call to love our neighbor, catholic charities of the archdiocese of omaha enables the works of mercy to be received and lived.

—
8
Ave Maria Communications

Ave Maria Communications (AMC)employs radio, internet and other media to offer news, analysis, teaching, devotion and music to demonstrate Catholic values.

Religion
9
Arise Chicago

Arise chicago builds partnerships between faith communities and workers to fight workplace injustice through education, organizing, and advocating for public policy changes.

Employment
10
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
11
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
12
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
23/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $1,483,332 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESHoly Cross Foreign Mission Society: $400,000 · OtherHoly Cross Foreign Mission SocietySVSU FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherSVSU FOUNDATIONCatholic Dioceses of Venice: $150,000 · OtherHOME MISSIONERS OF AMERICA: $145,000 · Other+58 more: $1,506,624 · Other+58 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $150,000 · EducationAXIS: $35,000 · Education+2 more: $7,000 · EducationCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $91,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $65,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $50,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAS: $50,000 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $32,000 · Human ServicesTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $6,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT ACADEMIES FOUNDATION: $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT CREATE: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $62,500 · HealthLIFECLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $50,240 · HealthROCKVILLE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $6,300 · HealthSaginaw Community Foundation: $70,500 · PhilanthropyFoundations and Donors Interested in Catholic Activities Inc: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,934,956Education$192,000International$157,000Human Services$138,000Youth Development$135,000Health$119,040Philanthropy$100,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT ACADEMIES FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $110,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $91,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSaginaw Community Foundation: $70,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $62,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetLIFECLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $50,240 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLY CROSS SERVICES INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAXIS: $35,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $32,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFoundations and Donors Interested in Catholic Activities Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSupport Our Aging Religious Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT CREATE: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFREE THE KIDS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMATTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetROCKVILLE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $6,300 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVET COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPFW FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT ACADEMIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Saginaw Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds FIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LIFECLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAS ↗
  • Who funds HOLY CROSS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AXIS ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds Foundations and Donors Interested in Catholic Activities Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Flint · Community Foundation for Muskegon County · Consumers Energy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Baird Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wolohan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wolohan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.9M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wolohan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph