Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wm Kilworth Fdn Tw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$328k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$467kHuman Services$271kHealth$193kFood & Nutrition$191kArts & Culture$143kYouth Development$121kHousing & Shelter$99kPublic Safety & Disaster$47kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $131k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $198k
$7,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND$30,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$25,000
INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON$20,700
EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK$20,000
R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUN$20,000
NOURISH PIERCE COUNTY$15,000
YWCA PIERCE COUNTY$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$12,000
PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE$10,000
TACOMA ARTS LIVE$10,000
GREENSTRIKE$10,000
NORTHWEST SINFONIETTA$10,000
NW FURNITURE BANK$7,500
ST VINCENT DE PAUL TACOME-PIERCE COUNTY$7,500
TACOMA YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OASIS YOUTH CENTER: $5k → 8%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $7k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $5k → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $5k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5k → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $5k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $8k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%HOPESPARKS: $5k → 9%HOPESPARKS: $5k → 9%HOPESPARKS: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 9%BRIDGES OF LOVE NW: $4k → 9%BRIDGES OF LOVE NW: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 57 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
27

Total granted

$1.5M
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+22%

Still filing today

79%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $95k · revenue +3%
  • IC
    INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON
    4× · 2022–2025 · $79k · revenue +8%
  • G
    GREENTRIKE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NETWORK DBA NETWORK LOBBY FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -9%
  • RM
    R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIPgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +59%
  • AM
    ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise of Pierce County

To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.

Housing & Shelter
2
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
3
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
4
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—
5
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
6
Bike Works Seattle

Bike Works promotes the bicycle as a vehicle for change to empower youth and build resilient communities.

Recreation & Sports
7
Network Services

Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

Human Services
8
Tacoma Art Museum

Tacoma Art Museum transforms our communities by sharing art that inspires broader perspectives and cultivates a compassionate future

Arts & Culture
9
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
10
Tenino Community Service Center

Tenino Community Service Center/Tenino Food Bank Plus is a deep-rooted community-based service center dedicated to feeding those within the Tenino school district (Tenino and Bucoda) that may be disadvantaged. In addition, it is our…

Food & Nutrition
11
Whatcom Dispute Resolution Center

Provide and promote constructive and collaborative approaches to conflict resolution through mediation, training, facilitation, supervised visits and community education.

Unclassified
12
Northwest Fair Housing Alliance

The mission of the Northwest Fair Housing Alliance is to eliminate housing discrimination and to ensure equal housing opportunity for the people of Washington State through education, counseling and advocacy.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Associated Ministries of Tacoma-Pierce County; the most unlike its peers is ForeverGreen Trails. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/58
Grantees still filing
35/58
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $95,000 · OtherMOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTHNourish Pierce County: $80,000 · OtherNourish Pierce CountyR MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUN: $50,000 · OtherR MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNYWCA PIERCE COUNTY: $45,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $43,000 · Other+53 more: $599,700 · Other+53 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND: $225,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET…INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON: $79,400 · EducationINDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF…R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP: $20,000 · EducationR MERLE PALMER MINORITY…DEGREES OF CHANGE: $18,500 · Education+2 more: $17,500 · EducationGREENTRIKE: $50,000 · Arts & CultureGREENTRIKETACOMA ARTS LIVE: $37,000 · Arts & CultureTACOMA ART…NORTHWEST SINFONIETTA INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST …TACOMA YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $22,500 · Arts & CultureTACOMA YOU…Museum of Glass: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of …SYMPHONY TACOMA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSYMPHONY T…FOSS WATERWAY SEAPORT: $7,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CulturePuyallup Valley St Francis House: $37,000 · Human ServicesNW FURNITURE BANK: $22,500 · Human ServicesHopeSparks: $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesTacoma Urban League: $10,000 · Human ServicesTacoma Community House: $10,000 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesBridges of Love NW: $6,000 · Human ServicesOASIS YOUTH CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY: $88,000 · Food & NutritionGIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $26,500 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INC: $23,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE YOUTH MARINE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentOasis Youth Center: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentRebuilding Together South Sound: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW PHOEBE HOUSE: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterEXODUS HOUSING: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCJK COMMUNITY HOMES: $4,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$912,700Education$360,400Arts & Culture$169,000Human Services$125,500Food & Nutrition$88,000Youth Development$57,000Housing & Shelter$51,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND: $225,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $95,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY: $88,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNourish Pierce County: $80,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetINDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON: $79,400 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGREENTRIKE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYWCA PIERCE COUNTY: $45,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTACOMA ARTS LIVE: $37,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPuyallup Valley St Francis House: $37,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN: $29,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAHAT Homecare: $28,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $26,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CLINIC: $25,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetNORTHWEST SINFONIETTA INC: $25,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetRebuilding Together South Sound: $25,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER: $24,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INC: $23,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNW FURNITURE BANK: $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTACOMA YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $22,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE NETWORK DBA NETWORK LOBBY FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGoodwill of the Olympics and Rainier Region: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetR MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPOINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $20,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDEGREES OF CHANGE: $18,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHopeSparks: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTACOMA COMMUNITY BOAT BUILDERS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWRITE253: $15,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetMuseum of Glass: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW PHOEBE HOUSE: $12,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON: $12,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Children: $10,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOR A HEALTHY BAY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTacoma Urban League: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSYMPHONY TACOMA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTacoma Community House: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES: $10,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetEXODUS HOUSING: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE STREETS CAMPAIGN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPIERCE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetARK INSTITUTE OF LEARNING: $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFOSS WATERWAY SEAPORT: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetForeverGreen Trails: $6,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Nourish Pierce County ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds GREENTRIKE ↗
  • Who funds YWCA PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds TACOMA ARTS LIVE ↗
  • Who funds Puyallup Valley St Francis House ↗
  • Who funds LINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds AHAT Homecare ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST SINFONIETTA INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together South Sound ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds NW FURNITURE BANK ↗
  • Who funds TACOMA YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NETWORK DBA NETWORK LOBBY FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Goodwill of the Olympics and Rainier Region ↗
  • Who funds R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP ↗
  • Who funds POINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DEGREES OF CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds HopeSparks ↗
  • Who funds TACOMA COMMUNITY BOAT BUILDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WRITE253 ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Glass ↗
  • Who funds NEW PHOEBE HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fuchsg & M Fdn TaiMN88.5× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · The Bamford Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Heidner Marco J Char Trust · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · Woodworth Family Foundation · Forest Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Sequoia Foundation · June & Julian Foss Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wm Kilworth Fdn Tw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wm Kilworth Fdn Tw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wm Kilworth Fdn Tw’s filings →

More from the funding graph