Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wm Kilworth Fdn Tw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$328k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Education$467kHuman Services$271kHealth$193kFood & Nutrition$191kArts & Culture$143kYouth Development$121kHousing & Shelter$99kPublic Safety & Disaster$47kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $131k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $198k
$7,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND$30,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$25,000
INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON$20,700
R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUN$20,000
EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK$20,000
YWCA PIERCE COUNTY$15,000
NOURISH PIERCE COUNTY$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$12,000
NORTHWEST SINFONIETTA$10,000
PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE$10,000
TACOMA ARTS LIVE$10,000
GREENSTRIKE$10,000
TACOMA YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC$7,500
ST VINCENT DE PAUL TACOME-PIERCE COUNTY$7,500
GOODWILL OLYMPICS & RANIER REGION$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OASIS YOUTH CENTER: $5k → 8%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $7k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $5k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $5k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5k → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $5k → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $8k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%HOPESPARKS: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%HOPESPARKS: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%HOPESPARKS: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 9%BRIDGES OF LOVE NW: $4k → 9%BRIDGES OF LOVE NW: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
WI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 57 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
27

Total granted

$1.5M
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+22%

Still filing today

79%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $95k · revenue +3%
  • IC
    INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON
    4× · 2022–2025 · $79k · revenue +8%
  • G
    GREENTRIKE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • RM
    R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIPgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +59%
  • AM
    ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • TN
    THE NETWORK DBA NETWORK LOBBY FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise of Pierce County

To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.

Housing & Shelter
2
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
3
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
4
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—
5
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
6
Bike Works Seattle

Bike Works promotes the bicycle as a vehicle for change to empower youth and build resilient communities.

Recreation & Sports
7
Network Services

Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

Human Services
8
Tacoma Art Museum

Tacoma Art Museum transforms our communities by sharing art that inspires broader perspectives and cultivates a compassionate future

Arts & Culture
9
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
10
Tenino Community Service Center

Tenino Community Service Center/Tenino Food Bank Plus is a deep-rooted community-based service center dedicated to feeding those within the Tenino school district (Tenino and Bucoda) that may be disadvantaged. In addition, it is our…

Food & Nutrition
11
Whatcom Dispute Resolution Center

Provide and promote constructive and collaborative approaches to conflict resolution through mediation, training, facilitation, supervised visits and community education.

Unclassified
12
Northwest Fair Housing Alliance

The mission of the Northwest Fair Housing Alliance is to eliminate housing discrimination and to ensure equal housing opportunity for the people of Washington State through education, counseling and advocacy.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Associated Ministries of Tacoma-Pierce County and the most unlike its peers is ForeverGreen Trails. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySupportive Housing & Servic…Youth Music Education & Per…Professional Performing ArtsInternational Christian Mis…Local History & Heritage Mu…Immigrant & Ethnic Communit…Pacific Northwest Conservat…Private Recreational ClubsCommunity Food BanksFamily Philanthropic Founda…Healthcare & Social Service…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%2%<5yr15%9%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr19%36%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr12%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%1%<5yr15%3%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr19%27%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr12%40%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/61
the rest of the field
14%
2,245/16,502

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/58
Grantees still filing
35/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $95,000 · OtherMOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTHNourish Pierce County — $80,000 · OtherNourish Pierce CountyR MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUN — $50,000 · OtherR MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNYWCA PIERCE COUNTY — $45,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES — $43,000 · Other+53 more — $599,700 · Other+53 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND — $225,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET…INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON — $79,400 · EducationINDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF…R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP — $20,000 · EducationR MERLE PALMER MINORITY…DEGREES OF CHANGE — $18,500 · Education+2 more — $17,500 · EducationGREENTRIKE — $50,000 · Arts & CultureGREENTRIKETACOMA ARTS LIVE — $37,000 · Arts & CultureTACOMA ART…NORTHWEST SINFONIETTA INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST …TACOMA YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $22,500 · Arts & CultureTACOMA YOU…Museum of Glass — $15,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of …SYMPHONY TACOMA — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSYMPHONY T…FOSS WATERWAY SEAPORT — $7,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $2,000 · Arts & CulturePuyallup Valley St Francis House — $37,000 · Human ServicesNW FURNITURE BANK — $22,500 · Human ServicesHopeSparks — $15,000 · Human ServicesTacoma Community House — $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES — $10,000 · Human ServicesTacoma Urban League — $10,000 · Human ServicesBridges of Love NW — $6,000 · Human ServicesOASIS YOUTH CENTER — $5,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $88,000 · Food & NutritionGIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $26,500 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INC — $23,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE YOUTH MARINE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentOasis Youth Center — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentRebuilding Together South Sound — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW PHOEBE HOUSE — $12,500 · Housing & ShelterEXODUS HOUSING — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCJK COMMUNITY HOMES — $4,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$912,700Education$360,400Arts & Culture$169,000Human Services$125,500Food & Nutrition$88,000Youth Development$57,000Housing & Shelter$51,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND — $225,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $95,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $88,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNourish Pierce County — $80,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetINDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON — $79,400 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGREENTRIKE — $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYWCA PIERCE COUNTY — $45,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTACOMA ARTS LIVE — $37,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPuyallup Valley St Francis House — $37,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN — $29,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAHAT Homecare — $28,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $26,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRebuilding Together South Sound — $25,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CLINIC — $25,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetNORTHWEST SINFONIETTA INC — $25,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER — $24,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INC — $23,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTACOMA YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $22,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNW FURNITURE BANK — $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetR MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP — $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGoodwill of the Olympics and Rainier Region — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $20,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE NETWORK DBA NETWORK LOBBY FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE — $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDEGREES OF CHANGE — $18,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHopeSparks — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTACOMA COMMUNITY BOAT BUILDERS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWRITE253 — $15,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetMuseum of Glass — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW PHOEBE HOUSE — $12,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WASHINGTON — $12,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTacoma Community House — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEXODUS HOUSING — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSYMPHONY TACOMA — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAFE STREETS CAMPAIGN — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES — $10,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetFriends of the Children — $10,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOR A HEALTHY BAY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTacoma Urban League — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPIERCE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFOSS WATERWAY SEAPORT — $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARK INSTITUTE OF LEARNING — $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBridges of Love NW — $6,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Nourish Pierce County ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds GREENTRIKE ↗
  • Who funds YWCA PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds TACOMA ARTS LIVE ↗
  • Who funds Puyallup Valley St Francis House ↗
  • Who funds LINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds AHAT Homecare ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together South Sound ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST SINFONIETTA INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds TACOMA YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NW FURNITURE BANK ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Goodwill of the Olympics and Rainier Region ↗
  • Who funds POINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE NETWORK DBA NETWORK LOBBY FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds DEGREES OF CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds HopeSparks ↗
  • Who funds TACOMA COMMUNITY BOAT BUILDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WRITE253 ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Glass ↗
  • Who funds NEW PHOEBE HOUSE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fuchsg & M Fdn TaiGreater Tacoma Commun…Kilworth Florence Cha…The Bamford FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Heidner Marco J Char …Gary E Milgard Family…Woodworth Family Foun…Forest FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Sequoia FoundationJune & Julian Foss Fo…
Fuchsg & M Fdn TaiMN88.5× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · The Bamford Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Heidner Marco J Char Trust · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · Woodworth Family Foundation · Forest Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Sequoia Foundation · June & Julian Foss Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wm Kilworth Fdn Tw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home