Skip to content
Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc

The mission of wisconsin coalition against sexual assault, inc.

$20k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$170kCrime & Legal$159kHuman Services$47kEducation$32k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$19,972
Median grant
1
States reached
$753k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED WIND CONSULTING INC$19,972
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hope House of South Central Wisconsin Inc: $63k → 9%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10k → 11%WAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE: $10k → 11%HOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $25k → 9%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $7k → 11%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$350k · 7 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$350k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+52%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $90k · revenue +118%
  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $88k · revenue +17%
  • WW
    WISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $80k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • SB
    SAFE BAR NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $34k · revenue +147%
  • CHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +11%
  • WAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
2
Wrc Inc

The women's resource center's mission is to eliminate domestic violence and sexual assault abuse through advocacy, education, system change, and empowering services to all surviors. the center provides sexual assault and domestic violence…

—
3
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
4
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
5
Women's Alliance Inc

Provide servies to victims of domestic violence, sexual assualt and homeless families.

Human Services
6
Crisis Center & Women's Shelter Inc

To promote a culture of non-violence and social justice through the empowerment of all those impacted by domestic violence.

Human Services
7
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

Human Services
8
Center for Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Survivors Inc

The mission of the center for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors is to advocate for non-violence through intervention, education, and prevention in order to create a safe environment for all individuals, families and…

Human Services
9
Clinton County Women's Center Inc

Provide crisis intervention, counseling, and shelter; support and empowerment; education, information, and referrals to victims of sexual and domestic violence and to those significant in their lives; and outreach related to the issues of…

Human Services
10
Second Chance Dv Sa Shelter

Assist individuals and families experiencing domestic abuse and sexual assault by providing crisis intervention and a full range of support services. second chance also works to emplower the community to understand and prevent the crimes…

Arts & Culture
11
Stillwater Domestic Violence

Stillwater domestic violance dba wings of hope: the wings of hope family crisis services provides comprehensive services to individual experiencing domestic violence, sexual assault, stalkin and child abuse. the agency strives to provide…

Human Services
12
Domestic Abusesexual Assault Services Inc

To provide free, confidential, and empowering services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking while raising awareness and prevention efforts throughout our communities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Household Abuse Victims Emergency Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Waking Women Healing Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC: $90,040 · HealthRAPE CRISIS CENTER INCWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC: $80,137 · HealthWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INCHOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $87,956 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCO…PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCWAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE: $10,000 · Human ServicesWAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTEHOUSEHOLD ABUSE VICTIMS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC: $22,500 · OtherHOUSEHOLD ABUS…COMMUNITY REFERRAL AGENCY INC: $14,440 · OtherCOMMUNITY REFE…CHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN: $13,996 · OtherCHILDREN'S SER…SAFE BAR NETWORK INC: $34,290 · Crime & LegalSAFE BAR …Red Wind Consulting Inc: $31,972 · Education
Health$170,177Human Services$120,456Other$50,936Crime & Legal$34,290Education$31,972

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAPE CRISIS CENTER INC: $90,040 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $87,956 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC: $80,137 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetSAFE BAR NETWORK INC: $34,290 over 1y, 19% of budgetRed Wind Consulting Inc: $31,972 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHOUSEHOLD ABUSE VICTIMS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC: $22,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $22,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY REFERRAL AGENCY INC: $14,440 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN: $13,996 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers Fou…Otto Bremer TrustFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Green Bay Packers FoundationWI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home