Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc

The mission of wisconsin coalition against sexual assault, inc.

$20k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Health$170kCrime & Legal$159kHuman Services$47kEducation$32k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$19,972
Median grant
1
States reached
$918k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED WIND CONSULTING INC$19,972
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hope House of South Central Wisconsin Inc: $63k → 9%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10k → 11%WAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE: $10k → 11%HOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $25k → 9%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $7k → 11%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$350k · 7 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$350k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+52%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $90k · revenue +118%
  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $88k · revenue +17%
  • WW
    WISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $80k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • SB
    SAFE BAR NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $34k · revenue +147%
  • CHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +11%
  • WAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

2
Wrc Inc

The women's resource center's mission is to eliminate domestic violence and sexual assault abuse through advocacy, education, system change, and empowering services to all surviors. the center provides sexual assault and domestic violence…

3
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

4
Women's Alliance Inc

Provide servies to victims of domestic violence, sexual assualt and homeless families.

Human Services
5
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
6
Crisis Center & Women's Shelter Inc

To promote a culture of non-violence and social justice through the empowerment of all those impacted by domestic violence.

Human Services
7
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

Human Services
8
Center for Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Survivors Inc

The mission of the center for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors is to advocate for non-violence through intervention, education, and prevention in order to create a safe environment for all individuals, families and…

Human Services
9
Clinton County Women's Center Inc

Provide crisis intervention, counseling, and shelter; support and empowerment; education, information, and referrals to victims of sexual and domestic violence and to those significant in their lives; and outreach related to the issues of…

Human Services
10
White County Domestic Violence Prevention Inc

Prevention of domestic violence and protection and assistance to women and children who are victims of abuse.

Human Services
11
Domestic Abusesexual Assault Services Inc

To provide free, confidential, and empowering services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking while raising awareness and prevention efforts throughout our communities.

Human Services
12
Stillwater Domestic Violence

Stillwater domestic violance dba wings of hope: the wings of hope family crisis services provides comprehensive services to individual experiencing domestic violence, sexual assault, stalkin and child abuse. the agency strives to provide…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Referral Agency Inc and the most unlike its peers is Waking Women Healing Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC — $90,040 · HealthRAPE CRISIS CENTER INCWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC — $80,137 · HealthWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INCHOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC — $87,956 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCO…PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $22,500 · Human ServicesPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCWAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE — $10,000 · Human ServicesWAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTEHOUSEHOLD ABUSE VICTIMS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC — $22,500 · OtherHOUSEHOLD ABUS…COMMUNITY REFERRAL AGENCY INC — $14,440 · OtherCOMMUNITY REFE…CHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN — $13,996 · OtherCHILDREN'S SER…SAFE BAR NETWORK INC — $34,290 · Crime & LegalSAFE BAR …Red Wind Consulting Inc — $31,972 · Education
Health$170,177Human Services$120,456Other$50,936Crime & Legal$34,290Education$31,972

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRAPE CRISIS CENTER INC — $90,040 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC — $87,956 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC — $80,137 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetSAFE BAR NETWORK INC — $34,290 over 1y, 19% of budgetRed Wind Consulting Inc — $31,972 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHOUSEHOLD ABUSE VICTIMS EMERGENCY NETWORK INC — $22,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $22,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY REFERRAL AGENCY INC — $14,440 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN — $13,996 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKING WOMEN HEALING INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph