· Public charity
Wisconsin Balance of State Continuum of Care Inc
To ensure the efficient and effective delivery of housing and services to people who are homeless in the wisconsin balance of state service area.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $309k
- $50k–250k23 grants · $3.1M
- $250k+5 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOLDEN HOUSE | $616,605 |
| NEWCAP | $609,486 |
| KENOSHA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | $447,189 |
| BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC | $379,928 |
| FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTH WI | $333,489 |
| HEBRON HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY | $243,934 |
| COULEECAP INC | $240,283 |
| CW SOLUTIONS | $237,400 |
| NEW HORIZONS SHELTERS AND OUTREACH CENTER | $227,312 |
| EMBRACE SERVICES INC | $218,622 |
| IN COURAGE | $209,297 |
| ADVOCAP | $200,658 |
| WESTERN DAIRYLAND | $161,121 |
| NORTHWEST WISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES | $150,094 |
| CENTRAL WI COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL | $145,887 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $696k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NINEWCAP INC7× · 2018–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +44%
- GHGOLDEN HOUSE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +96%
- WCWEST CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $858k · revenue +151%
Funded once
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WEST CENTRAL WISone grant, 2023 · $31k · revenue -9%
- WAWISCONSIN ASSOCIATION FOR RUNAWAY SERVICES INCone grant, 2022 · $28k · revenue -14%
Catholic Charities of the Dioceseone grant, 2019 · $24k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.
Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…
In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.
Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.
The mission of help of door county, inc. is to eliminate domestic abuse through prevention and intervention services and to advocate for social change.
Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.
Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.
The purpose of neighborhood housing services of southeast wisconsin, inc. is to renew pride, restore confidence,promote reinvestment, and revitalize the nhs neighborhoods through the efforts of local residents acting in concert with…
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
Women's and children's crisis shelter is committed to providing safety, shelter and hope to victims of domestic violence.
The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.
To strengthen and serve community action in wisconsin.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Central Wisconsin Community Action Agency Inc and the most unlike its peers is Black Leaders Acquiring Collective Knowledge (Black) Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEWCAP INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCAP INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST WISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds KENOSHA HUMAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN DAIRYLAND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHERN WISCONSIN AND NORTHERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds INCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HEBRON HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY INC D/B/A HEBRON HOUSING SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF OZAUKEE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS SHELTER AND OUTREACH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION INC OF ROCK & WALWORTH COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds EMBRACE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds RENEWAL UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE CAP INC OF WISCONSIN ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds EVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INC ↗
- Who funds Housing Action Coalition of Waukesha County Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT AND RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT ALCOHOL AND DRUG EDUCATION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUTH AND FAMILY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA LA CROSSE INC ↗
- Who funds Community Action Inc ↗
- Who funds END DOMESTIC ABUSE WISCONSIN THE WI COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds COULEECAP INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds PILLARS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Wheda Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Community Action Program Association Incorporated · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Alm Charities Inc · Eau Claire Community Foundation · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wisconsin Balance of State Continuum of Care Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Action Inc — 52% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.