Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wintman Family Charitable Trust B

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$158k
Granted FY2025still arriving
64
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Civil Rights$143kHuman Services$141kInternational$133kArts & Culture$121kEnvironment$88kPublic Benefit$82kFood & Nutrition$67kEducation$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k57 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $102k
$500
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JCC$30,000
ABRAHAM INITIATIVES$15,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$15,000
PRO PUBLICA$11,000
FOOD BANK OF WM$10,700
NATL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$10,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$10,000
MASS HOUSING & SHELTER ALLIANCE$5,000
ENVIRONMENTAL & ENERGY STUDY INST$5,000
YIDDISH BOOK CENTER$3,120
RACHEL'S TABLE$3,000
CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$2,100
ACLU$2,000
HEALING ACROSS THE DIVIDES$2,000
BERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER: $2k → 12%BERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER: $2k → 12%BERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER: $2k → 12%RED CROSS: $100 → 14%RED CROSS: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
KS
AR
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$751k · 81 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

81 repeat relationships: 55 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
23

Total granted

$751k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+24%

Still filing today

51%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PRO PUBLICA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $94k · revenue +64%
  • NR
    Nonhuman Rights Project Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $47k · revenue +38%
  • EA
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY STUDY INSTITUTE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • EC
    EVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -12%
  • J
    JEF
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
5
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
6
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
10
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
11
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
12
The Brookings Institution

The brookings institution (brookings) is a nonprofit public policy organization that conducts in-depth, independent research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society at the local, national, and global level.…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Richmond Land Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/54
Grantees still filing
40/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $102,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEJCC: $56,518 · OtherJCCNEPRWFCR: $42,400 · OtherNEPRWFCRFOOD BANK: $38,888 · OtherFOOD BANKENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY STUDY INSTITUTE: $30,750 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY STUDY INSTITUTEADL: $17,500 · Other+69 more: $170,062 · Other+69 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND: $94,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDTHE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES INC: $92,000 · InternationalTHE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES I…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $7,000 · International+5 more: $12,850 · International+5 morePRO PUBLICA INC: $93,500 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA I…NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $5,920 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YIDD…+6 more: $5,605 · Arts & Culture+6 moreEVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE: $20,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $12,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $7,500 · EnvironmentPesticide Action Network North America: $3,500 · EnvironmentBERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC: $3,500 · Environment+4 more: $2,037 · EnvironmentNonhuman Rights Project Inc: $47,000 · Animals+1 more: $250 · AnimalsHEALING ACROSS THE DIVIDES INC: $12,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC: $2,000 · HealthTHE BRIEN CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES: $2,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,750 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,050 · HealthBERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesOPEN PANTRY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesSPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION: $2,100 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,250 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human Services
Other$458,118International$205,850Arts & Culture$105,025Environment$56,037Animals$47,250Health$18,800Human Services$13,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $94,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $93,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES INC: $92,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetNonhuman Rights Project Inc: $47,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY STUDY INSTITUTE: $30,750 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetEVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING ACROSS THE DIVIDES INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPITTSFIELD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $5,920 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN PANTRY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPesticide Action Network North America: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPUTNEY SCHOOL INC: $2,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDRAMA STUDIO INCORPORATED: $2,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION: $2,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIEN CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $1,255 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF COMBATANTS FOR PEACE INC: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLINK TO LIBRARIES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLander-Grinspoon Academy Solomon Schechter Day School: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS' HOUSING AND PLANNING ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRICHMOND LAND TRUST: $750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Gray House Inc: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $737 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOpening Act Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERKSHIRE THEATRE GROUP INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ABRAHAM INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds Nonhuman Rights Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY STUDY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING ACROSS THE DIVIDES INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSFIELD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN PANTRY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Pesticide Action Network North America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation IncMA21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Jewish Communal Fund · Marguerite Jossel Charitable Foundation · Henrietta F Dexter Tuw-Dexter Ch

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wintman Family Charitable Trust B funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wintman Family Charitable Trust B. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Citizens' Housing and Planning Association Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Berkshire Immigrant Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Drama Studio Incorporated: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Natural Resources Council Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Theatre Group Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wintman Family Charitable Trust B’s filings →

More from the funding graph