Skip to content

· Private foundation

Winifred Stevens Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
122
Grants FY2024still arriving
30
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$14MReligion$12MInternational$11MEducation$9.6MHealth$6.1MArts & Culture$2.0MEnvironment$1.7MHuman Services$1.7MOther$0
02FY2024 · 122 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k55 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k58 grants · $5.3M
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.5M
$50,000
Median grant
30
States reached
$139M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,820,000
UPPER COLUMBIA CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS$380,000
GENERAL CONFERENCE HEALTH MINISTRIES$270,000
LIBERTY IN NORTH KOREA$200,000
HOLBROOK INDIAN SCHOOL$150,000
ADVENTIST DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF AGENCY INTERNATIONAL$150,000
PINE FORGE ACADEMY$150,000
WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY$150,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
EQUALITY NOW INC$145,000
ASAP MINISTRIES INC$130,000
OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC$125,000
POTOMAC CONFERENCE CORPORATION OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS$125,000
HOLBROOK INDIAN SCHOOL$123,000
SPRINGFIELD SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH$121,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FIVE LOAVES FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%IMPACT HOPE: $100k → 8%SOLIHTEN INSTITUTE: $20k → 8%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE ON THE PALOUSE: $25k → 20%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE ON THE PALOUSE: $25k → 20%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE OF THE PALOUSE: $25k → 20%IMPACT HOPE: $55k → 8%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE OF THE PALOUSE: $25k → 20%IMPACT HOPE: $55k → 8%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE ON THE PALOUSE: $25k → 20%IMPACT HOPE: $50k → 8%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE ON THE PALOUSE: $25k → 16%IMPACT HOPE: $75k → 8%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE ON THE PALOUSE: $25k → 16%IMPACT HOPE: $65k → 8%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $125k → 11%IMPACT HOPE: $55k → 8%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $125k → 11%IMPACT HOPE: $35k → 8%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $125k → 11%WALLA WALLA COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $25k → 13%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $125k → 11%WALLA WALLA COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $8k → 13%OPERATION SAFEHOUSE: $125k → 11%OPERATION SAFEHOUSE: $50k → 11%HOUSE OF RUTH: $75k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $75k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $75k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $75k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Winifred Stevens Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Winifred Stevens Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45M · 82 repeat orgs$8.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

82 repeat relationships: 62 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
54

Total granted

$45M
$6.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-10%

Still filing today

46%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthReligionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ADVENTIST DEVELOPMENT & RELIEF AGENCY INTERNATIONAL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +20%
  • WW
    WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +4%
  • LG
    LINK GLOBAL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • HF
    HARBOR FUND INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1.2M · revenue -155%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $800k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

—
2
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
6
Living Water International

Living Water International ("Living Water") exists to demonstrate the love of God by helping communities in 17 developing countries acquire desperately needed clean water and to experience "living water" - the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Human Services
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
8
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
9
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
10
Harvesters International Ministries

Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community

Religion
11
Adventive Cross Cultural Initiatives

ACCI serves pioneering Christians, empowering them to proclaim the gospel, fulfill their God-given visions, and advance the kingdom of God. ACCI longs for a world where lives are transformed through the Holy Spirit, where new disciples are…

Religion
12
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Impact International; the most unlike its peers is Manasseh's Children Dba Ujamaa-Africa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/67
Grantees still filing
38/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,880,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST: $2,287,899 · OtherGENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,820,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONGENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST: $1,317,000 · OtherHARBOR FUND INC: $1,200,000 · OtherGENERAL CONFERENCE HEALTH MINISTRIES: $1,155,000 · Other+114 more: $23,279,917 · Other+114 moreCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,018,900 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY …RESTORE A CHILD INC: $1,720,000 · PhilanthropyRESTORE A CHILD INC+3 more: $170,000 · PhilanthropyADVENTIST DEVELOPMENT & RELIEF AGENCY INTERNATIONAL: $3,720,000 · InternationalADVENTIST DEVELOP…LINK GLOBAL: $1,650,000 · InternationalLINK GLOBALAdventist Health International: $1,093,748 · InternationalAdventist Health …Equality Now Inc: $1,000,000 · InternationalEquality Now IncASAP MINISTRIES INC: $873,000 · InternationalASAP MINISTRIES I…CHRISTALIS INC: $362,241 · International+13 more: $895,750 · International+13 moreWALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY: $2,157,500 · EducationANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $658,220 · EducationINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION FOR ADVENTIST COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES: $200,000 · Education+3 more: $77,000 · EducationLight Bearers Ministry: $1,590,000 · ReligionCREATION ILLUSTRATED MINISTRIES INC: $325,000 · ReligionGOOD NEWS BROADCASTING NETWORK INC: $120,000 · Religion+1 more: $50,000 · ReligionOPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $850,000 · Human ServicesIMPACT HOPE: $490,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $375,000 · Human ServicesALTERNATIVE TO VIOLENCE OF THE PALOUSE INC: $175,100 · Human ServicesFIVE LOAVES FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Human Services+2 more: $52,500 · Human ServicesWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $865,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $210,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC: $150,000 · Animals
Other$33,939,816Philanthropy$11,908,900International$9,594,739Education$3,092,720Religion$2,085,000Human Services$2,042,600Animals$1,225,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,018,900 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetADVENTIST DEVELOPMENT & RELIEF AGENCY INTERNATIONAL: $3,720,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetWALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY: $2,157,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetRESTORE A CHILD INC: $1,720,000 over 7y, 46% of budgetLINK GLOBAL: $1,650,000 over 7y, 8.1% of budgetLight Bearers Ministry: $1,590,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetAdventist Health International: $1,093,748 over 6y, 10% of budgetEquality Now Inc: $1,000,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetOAKWOOD UNIVERSITY: $946,900 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $875,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetASAP MINISTRIES INC: $873,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $865,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetOPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $850,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetWHITESIDE MANOR INC: $700,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $658,220 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMANASSEH'S CHILDREN DBA UJAMAA-AFRICA: $550,000 over 6y, 50% of budgetIMPACT HOPE: $490,000 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetWHYHUNGER INC: $450,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $375,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCHRISTALIS INC: $362,241 over 5y, 32% of budgetCREATION ILLUSTRATED MINISTRIES INC: $325,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC: $275,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetANDEAN HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $257,250 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $210,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $210,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWeimar Institute: $200,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION FOR ADVENTIST COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES: $200,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetLIVING FREE NON-PROFIT ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $200,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetAMOS HEALTH AND HOPE INC: $188,500 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $180,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALTERNATIVE TO VIOLENCE OF THE PALOUSE INC: $175,100 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH GRACE ALLIANCE: $150,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetIT IS WRITTEN INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGOOD NEWS BROADCASTING NETWORK INC: $120,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetSouthcentral Foundation: $117,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetON THE GROUND INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetWABANAKI HEALTH & WELLNESS NPC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFIVE LOAVES FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetGroundswell International Inc: $95,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC: $85,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCALEB CORPS INC: $75,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $61,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSicangu Community Development Corporation: $60,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTIST DEVELOPMENT & RELIEF AGENCY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE A CHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds LINK GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds Light Bearers Ministry ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Adventist Health International ↗
  • Who funds Equality Now Inc ↗
  • Who funds OAKWOOD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds ASAP MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITESIDE MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDREWS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MANASSEH'S CHILDREN DBA UJAMAA-AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT HOPE ↗
  • Who funds WHYHUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asi Missions IncMD32.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asi Missions Inc · Versacare Inc · Adventist Community Services North America Inc · The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc · Sffc Foundation Inc · D&E Foundation · Popoff Family Foundation · The Hernan & Orfi Barros Foundation · The Elqui Valley Foundation · Byron Robinson Educational Foundation Inc · Adventist Health System Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation · Peter Alfond Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Winifred Stevens Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Winifred Stevens Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Adventist Development & Relief Agency International: 35% of income from government
  • Washington Adventist University: 4% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Winifred Stevens Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Winifred Stevens Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 164 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Winifred Stevens’ filings →

More from the funding graph