· Private foundation
Winfield Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $125k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HISTORIC NEW ENGLAND | $20,000 |
| LONG ISLAND COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS | $9,500 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $8,000 |
| ST MARK'S SCHOOL | $7,500 |
| BOWERY MISSION | $6,500 |
| MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESERACH FOUNDATION | $6,500 |
| GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER | $6,500 |
| SEEDS OF HOPE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER | $5,500 |
| PAWS OF WAR FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| POUND RIDGE LAND CONSERVANCY | $5,000 |
| LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SOUND WATERS | $5,000 |
| WARRIORS AND QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $4,500 |
| ONE TREE PLANTED | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW ENGL9× · 2017–2025 · $175k · revenue +263%
- WQWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +236%
- GLGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +226%
Funded once
- UHUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +19%
- GNGREATER NEW YORK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -96%
- MLMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +149%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater New York Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Caddie School for Soldiers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW ENGL ↗
- Who funds POUND RIDGE LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
- Who funds NEXT GENERATION CHOICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc ↗
- Who funds East End Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF HOPE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds The Preservation Society of Charleston Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA ART ASSOCIATION DBA GIBBES MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC CHARLESTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
- Who funds UKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER NEW YORK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds APEX YOUTH CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF SOUTHBOROUGH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Widgeon Point Charitable Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Virginia Hodgkins Somers Foundation Inc · Horizon Foundation Inc · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · Onion Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Winfield Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Soundwaters Inc — 4% of income from government
- Society for the Preservation of New Engl — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.