· Private foundation
Win J and Christie C Neuger Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of WIN J AND CHRISTIE C NEUGER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k37 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UTS | $20,000 |
| BRITISH SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION | $19,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $5,000 |
| RICHFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $5,000 |
| JEREMIAH PROGRAM | $2,500 |
| BLACK MEN TEACH | $2,500 |
| COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS | $2,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $2,000 |
| YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS | $2,000 |
| MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION | $1,500 |
| SECOND HARVEST | $1,500 |
| WALKER ART CENTER | $1,000 |
| CARTER CENTER | $1,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $1,000 |
| SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BRITE DIVINITY SCHOOL2× · 2022–2023 · $201k · revenue +11%- WAWALKER ART CENTER4× · 2022–2025 · $128k · revenue +155%
- BSBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +133%
Funded once
- TSTuck School of Businessone grant, 2022 · $210k
- WCWALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue +19%
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…
Women's Foundation of Minnesota is a statewide community foundation investing in ending systemic inequities and driving innovation for gender and racial justice. WFM applies an Intersectional Equity Framework inclusive of gender, race,…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walker Art Center and the most unlike its peers is The Dartmouth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRITE DIVINITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds WALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds Black Men Teach ↗
- Who funds VEAP Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LAURA BAKER SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE GOD'S CHILD PROJECT ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHFIELD AREA FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds KENYON COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Minnesota Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · George Family Foundation · The Hubbard Broadcasting Foundation · The American Center for Philanthropy Inc · American Gift Fund · Fr Bigelow Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Win J and Christie C Neuger Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.