Skip to content
Williamson I FBO Charities Tuw at a glance

· Private foundation

Williamson I FBO Charities Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$180kHuman Services$138kCommunity Improvement$57kArts & Culture$52kPublic Benefit$52kMembership Benefit$37kCrime & Legal$31kFood & Nutrition$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,938
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
T SCATTERGOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FDN$7,876
TABOR SERVICES INC$7,876
FRIENDS FIDUCIARY CORPORATION$6,563
GREATER PHILA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$6,563
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL PHILADELPHIA FDN$6,563
EDITH RUDOLPHY RES FOR THE BLIND$6,563
UNION BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION$4,809
MOORE COLLEGE OF ART$3,938
MERCANTILE BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATION$3,938
PA PRISON SOC ALLEVIAT MISERY$3,938
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$2,625
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL INC$2,625
YOUTH SERVICE INC$2,625
TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN$2,625
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,625
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 22%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 22%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 22%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 22%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 22%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 22%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 22%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 22%TABOR SERVICES INC: $8k → 22%TABOR SERVICES INC: $8k → 22%TABOR SERVICES INC: $8k → 22%TABOR SERVICES INC: $8k → 22%TABOR SERVICES INC: $7k → 22%TABOR SERVICES INC: $7k → 22%TABOR SERVICES INC: $7k → 22%TABOR SERVICES INC: $7k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$590k · 18 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$590k
$5k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SCATTERGOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +430%
  • UB
    UNION BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +6%
  • SG
    SPRING GARDEN SOUP SOCIETY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • WA
    WESTERN ASSN LADIES FOR RELIEF
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
2
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
3
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
4
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
5
Presbyterian Medical Center of the University of Pennsylvania Health System

Provision of charitable healthcare services.

Health
6
Princeton Healthcare System a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of princeton healthcare system is to provide exceptional, compassionate care to enhance the health and wellness of our patients, their families, and our community. princeton healthcare system provides inpatient and outpatient…

Health
7
Pinnacle Health Medical Services

Pinnacle health medical services is a charitable organization dedicated to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all the people of central pennsylvania by providing primary, clinic, family and specialty physician…

Health
8
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
9
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
10
Temple University Health System Inc

Our mission is to provide access to high quality health care to the community and academic setting.

Education
11
Penn State Health

Penn state health's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people of pennsylvania, and beyond. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and equitable care; educates and trains (continued…

Health
12
Pinebrook Family Answers

The agency's mission states "pinebrook family answers nurtures and empowers children, adults and families by providing mental health services and community-based programs throughout the greater lehigh valley. we do this through initiatives…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Episcopal Community Services of the Diocese of Pennsylvania; the most unlike its peers is Scattergood Behavioral Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDRENS HOSPITAL PHILADELPHIA FDN: $49,887 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL PHILADELPHIA FDNEDITH RUDOLPHY RES FOR THE BLIND: $49,887 · OtherEDITH RUDOLPHY RES FOR THE BLINDUNION BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $37,046 · OtherUNION BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATIONPA ASYLUM FOR INDIGENT WIDOWS: $36,761 · OtherPA ASYLUM FOR INDIGENT WIDOWSMERCANTILE BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATION: $30,663 · OtherMERCANTILE BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATIONPA PRISON SOC ALLEVIAT MISERY: $30,663 · OtherPA PRISON SOC ALLEVIAT MISERYMOORE COLLEGE OF ART: $30,663 · OtherMOORE COLLEGE OF ARTGREATER PHILA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $25,963 · OtherGREATER PHILA COMMUNITY ALLIANCEUNITED COMMUNITIES SE PHILADELPHIA: $23,924 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITIES SE PHILADELPHIASEAMENS CHURCH INSTITUTE: $21,025 · OtherSEAMENS CHURCH INSTITUTEYOUTH SERVICE INC: $21,025 · OtherYOUTH SERVICE INCHistorical Society of Pennsylvania: $21,025 · OtherHistorical Society of Pennsylvania+1 more: $4,789 · OtherTabor Services Foundation Inc: $59,576 · Human ServicesTabor Services Fo…TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $21,025 · Human ServicesTURNING POINTS FO…Episcopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania: $21,025 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Communi…SCATTERGOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $59,576 · HealthSCATTERGOOD B…Temple University Hospital Inc: $21,025 · HealthTemple Univer…Friends Fiduciary Corporation: $51,686 · Public BenefitSPRING GARDEN SOUP SOCIETY: $29,376 · PhilanthropyTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $21,025 · Education
Other$383,321Human Services$101,626Health$80,601Public Benefit$51,686Philanthropy$29,376Education$21,025

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCATTERGOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $59,576 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTabor Services Foundation Inc: $59,576 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetFriends Fiduciary Corporation: $51,686 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNION BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $37,046 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetSPRING GARDEN SOUP SOCIETY: $29,376 over 8y, 12% of budgetTemple University Hospital Inc: $21,025 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $21,025 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania: $21,025 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE INC: $21,025 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $21,025 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHistorical Society of Pennsylvania: $21,025 over 8y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SCATTERGOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tabor Services Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends Fiduciary Corporation ↗
  • Who funds UNION BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SPRING GARDEN SOUP SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Temple University Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Episcopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Historical Society of Pennsylvania ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…The Philadelphia Foun…The William Penn Foun…Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New JerseyPA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Williamson I FBO Charities Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Williamson I FBO Charities Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Williamson I FBO Charities Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home