Skip to content

· Private foundation

William Stretesky Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$804k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.5MArts & Culture$1.4MCommunity Improvement$1.2MRecreation & Sports$1.1MEducation$324kPublic Safety & Disaster$244kMembership Benefit$210kHuman Services$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $198k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $178k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$22,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEDGWICK COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$400,000
Individual grant recipient$92,035
SEDGWICK COUNTY ECON DEV$85,534
Individual grant recipient$42,773
Individual grant recipient$35,000
COMM ECON DEV OF SEDG CTY$32,500
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SEDGWICK COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$25,000
Individual grant recipient$22,000
Individual grant recipient$16,211
HIPPODROME ARTS CENTRE$9,389
SEDGWICK COUNTY ORGANIZED RECREATIO$5,920
SEDGWICK COUNTY COMM BUSINESS$4,500
NORTHEAST COLORADO HEALTH DEPARTMEN$3,500
SEDGWICK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%REGIONAL HOME VISITATION PROGRAMBABY BEAR HUGS: $3k → 13%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LPS: $13k → 15%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LPS: $13k → 15%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LPS: $5k → 15%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LPS: $5k → 15%EASTERN COLORADO SERVICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED: $16k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 39 repeat orgs$980k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
34

Total granted

$5.6M
$980k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-50%
+20%

Still filing today

13%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.6M
  • SC
    SEDGWICK COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $972k
  • SC
    SEDGWICK COUNTY ORGANIZED RECREATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $796k · revenue -87% · 62% of their budget

Funded once

  • SC
    SEDGWICK COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $400k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • TO
    Town of JulesburgSC Golf Course
    one grant, 2021 · $108k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeastern Colorado Heritage Center

To preserve, promote and interpret the heritage of Southeastern Colorado and the plurality of its peoples.

—
2
Jefferson County Economic Development Co

Promotion of Jefferson County, Colorado for the purpose of attracting new commerce and industry to the county and to help maintain the commerce and industry presently therein.

—
3
First Southwest Community Fund

First Southwest Community Fund supports the dedicated entrepreneurial spirit of rural Colorado, by investing in the people, culture and ideas that fuel innovation and financial knowledge in our community, with an emphasis on areas of…

Human Services
4
Southern Colorado Economic Development District Inc

To assist member counties with economic development and assist with other loan programs.

Community Improvement
5
Salida Area Parks Open Space & Trails

Preservation of historical buildings and extension of Salida Trail System in co-operation with the City of Salida, Chaffee County Board of Commissioners and CDOT.

Environment
6
Huerfano County Economic Development Inc

Promotion of economic development, support local business, provide housing and business support, collaboration of government programs

Community Improvement
7
Eastern Plains Economic Development Corporation

To encourage, stimulate and promote economic development, expansion and diversification in southeastern montana

Community Improvement
8
Southwest Colorado Education Collaborati

The Southwest Colorado Education Collaborative strengthens diverse communities byproviding pathways in career readiness and higher education for students to build21st-century skills and economically viable futures.

Education
9
Chaffee County Economic Development Corporation

The Chaffee County Economic Development Corporations mission statement is to assure that Chaffee County is open for business and promote the retention, expansion, and creation of jobs.

Community Improvement
10
Ouray County Historical Society

Historical Society for Ouray County, Colorado Museum, Historical Programs, mining, ranching and indian exhibit and artifacts, archiving historical documents and historical programs for the general public.

—
11
Costilla County Economic Development Council Inc

The costilla county economic development council was founded to organize develop and promote educational, social, scientific, and economic benfits to residents of costilla county colorado.

Community Improvement
12
Sarpy County Economic Development Corp

Assist with business development

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sedgwick County Economic Development Corporation; the most unlike its peers is National Pony Express Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,570,061 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEDGWICK COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $972,084 · OtherSEDGWICK COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITALSEDGWICK COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER: $400,000 · OtherSEDGWICK COUNTY MEDICAL CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $198,112 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $182,011 · OtherSEDGWICK COUNTY ECON DEV: $172,226 · Other+59 more: $1,210,809 · Other+59 moreSEDGWICK COUNTY ORGANIZED RECREATION INC: $795,920 · Recreation & SportsSEDGWICK COUN…SEDGWICK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $704,044 · Community ImprovementSEDGWICK COU…HIPPODROME ARTS CENTRE: $102,316 · Arts & CultureThe Early Childhood Council: $35,000 · Human ServicesEASTERN COLORADO SERVICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs: $2,500 · Human ServicesGATEWAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,460 · Philanthropy
Other$4,905,303Recreation & Sports$795,920Community Improvement$704,044Arts & Culture$102,316Human Services$53,500Philanthropy$2,460

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEDGWICK COUNTY ORGANIZED RECREATION INC: $795,920 over 4y, 62% of budgetSEDGWICK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $704,044 over 7y, 96% of budgetHIPPODROME ARTS CENTRE: $102,316 over 8y, 16% of budgetThe Early Childhood Council: $35,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetEASTERN COLORADO SERVICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED INC: $16,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFORT SEDGWICK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $14,508 over 2y, 10% of budgetNATIONAL PONY EXPRESS CORPORATION: $6,500 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGATEWAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,460 over 1y, 6.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEDGWICK COUNTY ORGANIZED RECREATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEDGWICK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HIPPODROME ARTS CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds The Early Childhood Council ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN COLORADO SERVICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT SEDGWICK HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ernest & Lillian E Campbell FoundationCO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ernest & Lillian E Campbell Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William Stretesky Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William Stretesky Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William Stretesky’s filings →

    More from the funding graph