Skip to content

· Private foundation

William O Vann Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$138kEducation$23kRecreation & Sports$8kHuman Services$8kHealth$3kArts & Culture$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$24,600
Median grant
2
States reached
$521k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$24,600
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%YMCA: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$163k · 6 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$163k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

17%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $138k
  • PM
    PIONEER MONTESSORI SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +31%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5k

Funded once

  • IM
    IDAHO MAVERICKS
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • NM
    NATIONAL MS SOCIETY AL MS
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • NM
    NAUTILUS MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Pine School Inc

The Pine School's mission is to promote academic, artistic, and athletic excellence.

Education
2
Steamboat Springs Winter Sports Club Inc

To create champions on and off the mountain by developing life skills and providing growth opportunities through participation in sports.

—
3
Stratton Mountain School

Secondary education & ski training with mission to provide each student with the opportunity to pursue excellence in competitive winter sports and college preparatory academics while developing strong personal values.

Recreation & Sports
4
Mountain Village Charter School

Mountain Village is a public Nature-based, Montessori school, engaging students in experiences that integrate natural environments with the Montessori curriculum, igniting achievement in academic, social-emotional and physical development.

Education
5
Sunstone Montessori School Inc

To operate a school based on the educational model of maria montessori, including instruction for children ages 16 months to 15 years and with elementary and middle school for grades 1 through 8.

Education
6
Sun Valley Ski Education Foundation Inc

The sun valley ski education foundation, inc. is dedicated to providing winter sports programs for the youth of the wood river valley, to include all ability and interest levels, regardless of each participant's economic level. the primary…

—
7
Juneau Montessori School

To help every child to reach their full potential through a montessori education.

Education
8
Shades Mountain Community Park Inc

Provide baseball programs for youth in central and western Hoover, AL

Recreation & Sports
9
Snowy Range Academy

The mission of Snowy Range Academy is to offer an academically rigorous content-rich integrated educational program grounded in a common foundation and sequence of study. Snowy Range Academy will practice excellence and fairness in…

Education
10
Mountain Brook Sports Corporation

Raise funds for the construction of certain facilities and to purchase equipment, goods and services to be used by the sports programs of the Board of Education of the City of Mountain Brook, Alabama.

—
11
Steamboat Springs Youth Hockey Assoc

Providing youth the opportunity to play recreational ice hockey. In addition to individual and team skill development, SSYHA seeks to foster the development of life skills including sportsmanship, mutual respect, integrity, responsibility,…

Recreation & Sports
12
Swannanoa Valley Montessori School Inc

With an accomplished team of caring and dedicated Montessori educators, our mission is guiding preschool-6th grade students to academic achievement, forstering a love of learning, building character, and instilling the importance of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hailey Ice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Birmingham Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $138,100 · OtherST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH+10 more: $26,370 · Other+10 morePIONEER MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $12,000 · EducationPIONEER M…Sun Valley Community School Inc: $2,500 · EducationSun Valle…Mountain Brook City Schools Foundation: $500 · EducationSUN VALLEY JUNIOR HOCKEY INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsHAILEY ICE INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsWOOD RIVER BASEBALL & SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsYMCA: $1,000 · Human ServicesBirmingham Historical Society: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$164,470Education$15,000Recreation & Sports$3,000Human Services$1,000Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPIONEER MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $12,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSun Valley Community School Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY JUNIOR HOCKEY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAILEY ICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYMCA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOOD RIVER BASEBALL & SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBirmingham Historical Society: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PIONEER MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Sun Valley Community School Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY JUNIOR HOCKEY INC ↗
  • Who funds HAILEY ICE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JEMISON PARK ↗
  • Who funds YMCA ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER BASEBALL & SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Birmingham Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Brook City Schools Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William O Vann Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William O Vann Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William O Vann Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William O Vann Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William O Vann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph