Skip to content

Minnesota · Private foundation

William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$300k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$170,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 9
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$6.6M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCivil RightsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$220k20%
FY20246$225k0%
FY20237$230k0%
FY20229$290k22%
FY20219$245k56%
FY20205$205k40%
FY20194$180k25%
FY20183$75k33%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.4MAnimals$720kHuman Services$310kEducation$205kFood & Nutrition$160kYouth Development$125kCivil Rights$75kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Delta Waterfowl Foundation$720,00091%
Gustavus Adolphus College$180,00050%
Second Harvest Heartland$160,00040%
Salvation Army$150,0003n/a
Northern Star Council$125,00070%
Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc$80,00050%
Alliance Defending Freedom$75,00050%
Semper Fi & America's Fund$70,00030%
Ridgeview Foundation$40,00040%
Gary Sinise Foundation$25,00010%
Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Delta Waterfowl Foundation$720,00091%
Gustavus Adolphus College$180,00050%
Second Harvest Heartland$160,00040%
Salvation Army$150,0003n/a
Northern Star Council$125,00070%
Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc$80,00050%
Alliance Defending Freedom$75,00050%
Semper Fi & America's Fund$70,00030%
Ridgeview Foundation$40,00040%
Gary Sinise Foundation$25,00010%
Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation$25,00010%
Minnesota Assistance Council for Veterans$15,0001n/a
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc$15,00010%
Ducks Unlimited Inc$10,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($50k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $720,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetGustavus Adolphus College: $180,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSecond Harvest Heartland: $160,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthern Star Council: $125,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance Defending Freedom: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSemper Fi & America's Fund: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRidgeview Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGary Sinise Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Compare William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation

How much does William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation give?
William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $300,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 9 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (46%), Animals (24%), Human Services (10%).
Who are William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Delta Waterfowl Foundation ($720k), Gustavus Adolphus College ($180k), Second Harvest Heartland ($160k).
Does William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation based?
William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund Charitable Foundation is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William O Lund Jr and Natalie C Lund’s filings →

More from the funding graph