Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William Leatherbee Jr Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$51kHealth$34kReligion$15kRecreation & Sports$2kHousing & Shelter$1kAnimals$700Public Benefit$600Education$395Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $150
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$327k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWPORT HOSPITAL$10,000
ASSOCIATION OF MARIAN HELPERS$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $650) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE PRICE CENTER: $500 → 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
SD
RI
CA
MO
KY
VA
TN
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$73k · 14 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
37

Total granted

$73k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+71%

Still filing today

50%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Arts & CultureHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    Newport Hospital Foundation
    4× · 2018–2022 · $15k · revenue +30%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +19%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $500 · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SA
    SHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -1%
  • AA
    AUDRAIN AUTO MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SH
    SONGWRITERS' HALL OF FAME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
3
The Miriam Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, TMH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
6
The Bridgespan Group Inc

Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.

Community Improvement
7
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
8
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
9
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Preservation Society of Newport County and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Government Accountability R…Fallen First Responder Supp…Youth Development CentersLand Conservation Organizat…Faith-Based Senior LivingLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Veteran Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionClassical Music EnsemblesCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr13%3%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr18%45%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr18%17%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr18%50%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
10%
646/6,381

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OPERA HOUSE THEATRE — $15,722 · OtherOPERA HOUSE THEATREOPUS CARITATIS CORP — $6,500 · OtherOPUS CARITATIS CORPST COLUMBAS BERKELEY MEMORIAL CHAPEL — $5,500 · OtherST COLUMBAS BERKELEY MEMORIAL CHAPELAUDRAIN AUTO MUSEUM — $5,000 · OtherAUDRAIN AUTO MUSEUMMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL FUND — $2,200 · Other+29 more — $9,105 · Other+29 moreNewport Hospital Foundation — $15,000 · HealthNewport Hospital FoundationNewport Hospital — $10,000 · HealthNewport HospitalSHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC — $5,000 · HealthSHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC+2 more — $300 · HealthNEWPORT ART MUSEUM AND ART ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · Arts & CultureNEWPORT ART MUSEUM AND ART ASS…SONGWRITERS' HALL OF FAME INC — $1,500 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $2,245 · Arts & Culture+4 moreTHE IMPOSSIBLE DREAM INC — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentBARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $150 · Human ServicesROBERT POTTER LEAGUE FOR ANIMALS INC — $300 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc — $200 · AnimalsSAVE A DOG INC — $100 · Animals
Other$44,027Health$30,300Arts & Culture$28,745Recreation & Sports$1,000Environment$1,000Human Services$650Animals$600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEWPORT ART MUSEUM AND ART ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNewport Hospital Foundation — $15,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetNewport Hospital — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSONGWRITERS' HALL OF FAME INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE IMPOSSIBLE DREAM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY — $925 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT CHAPEL FOUNDATION — $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARRY L PRICE REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BRITISH ART INC — $500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetROBERT POTTER LEAGUE FOR ANIMALS INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCops Direct — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Christian Broadcasting Network Inc — $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC — $170 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Newport County Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHebrew Senior Life Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Van Beuren Charitable Foundation IncNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Van Beuren Charitable Foundation Inc · The Champlin Foundation · Joan V Winiarski & Teresa W Merrill Revocable Trust · Alletta Morris McBean Charitable Trust · Frederick Henry Prince Testamentary Trust · Loebs Family Foundation 7521-Xxxxxx16336 · Bird Charles Sumner Fdn Tr Udecl · Bazarsky Family Foundation · Hamilton Family Charitable Trust · Hamilton Family Foundation · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William Leatherbee Jr Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Friends of the Public Garden Inc1% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph