· Private foundation
William Knox Holt Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $250k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC | $50,000 |
| MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| JUST KEEP LIVIN FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC | $25,000 |
| MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| SAN JOAQUIN PIONEER & HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $15,000 |
| WITTE MUSEUM | $15,000 |
| AUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP | $10,000 |
| CMC FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS | $10,000 |
| THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE EXPLORER'S CLUB - TEXAS CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| MCNAY ART MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY - KINGSVILLE FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $175k · revenue +71%- CRCOLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC6× · 2019–2024 · $140k · revenue +62%
- WMWitte Museum6× · 2019–2024 · $136k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- ACALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGEone grant, 2021 · $25k
- HRHARTE RESEARCH INSTITUTEone grant, 2019 · $20k
- HPHIGHLAND PARK ELEMENTARY PTAone grant, 2021 · $14k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…
To provide broader recognition of the state's top achievers in medicine, engineering and science, and to build a stronger identity for texas as an important destination and center of achievement in these fields.
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
Lone Star Flight Museum (LSFM) celebrates flight and achievements in Texas aviation, engages youth through STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), and believes aviation inspires achievement and endless possibilities.
The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…
Our mission is to engage the scientist in all of us by igniting a spirit of inquiry. We strive to
The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…
The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio River Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Explorers Club - Texas Chapter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Witte Museum ↗
- Who funds JUST KEEP LIVIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOLDSWORTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO RIVER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP ↗
- Who funds MUNY CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Pease Park Conservancy ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MIND SCIENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN JOAQUIN PIONEER & HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Musical Bridges Around the World Inc ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE MILL ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOUNDATION FOR FREE ENTERPRI ↗
- Who funds EXPLORERS CLUB - TEXAS CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M University - Kingsville Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER AUSTIN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEEKER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Film Society of Austin Inc ↗
- Who funds Brazos Valley Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART ↗
- Who funds Western Health Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Brown Foundation Inc · Holt Atherton Educational Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Muriel F Siebert Foundation Inc · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · The Jesse H and Susan R Oppenheimer Foundation · Jack and Doris Smothers and Bud Smothers Memorial Foundation · The Moody Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization William Knox Holt Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to William Knox Holt Foundation?
Find your warmest path to William Knox Holt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.