Skip to content

· Private foundation

William J Cronin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$156k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$189kHuman Services$174kReligion$172kHousing & Shelter$107kYouth Development$88kCommunity Improvement$66kRecreation & Sports$55kPhilanthropy$54kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $119k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PATRICK'S CONGREGATION$15,600
HEALTHNET OF JANESVILLE$11,000
ECHO$10,000
COMMUNITY ACTION$9,500
PROJECT 1649$9,000
GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER$9,000
HOSPICE CARE INC$8,000
UNITED WAY BLACKHAWK REGION$7,800
CANCER COALITION OF ROCK COUNTY$7,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE$6,000
GATHERING PLACE OF MILTON$6,000
JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER$6,000
BLACKHAWK TECHNICAL COLLEGE$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,200
ST MARY'S CONGREGATION$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER: $9k → 10%GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER: $9k → 10%GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER: $7k → 10%GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER: $7k → 10%GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER: $7k → 10%GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER: $7k → 10%GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER: $5k → 10%GATHERING PLACE OF MILTON: $6k → 10%GATHERING PLACE OF MILTON: $6k → 10%THE GATHERING PLACE OF MILTON: $5k → 10%THE GATHERING PLACE OF MILTON: $5k → 10%THE GATHERING PLACE OF MILTON: $5k → 10%THE GATHERING PLACE OF MILTON: $5k → 10%THE GATHERING PLACE OF MILTON: $5k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $6k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $6k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $4k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $4k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $4k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $4k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $2k → 10%ECHO: $10k → 10%ECHO: $10k → 10%ECHO: $8k → 10%ECHO: $7k → 10%ECHO: $7k → 10%ECHO: $7k → 10%ECHO: $6k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$999k · 30 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
1

Total granted

$999k
$4k

Still filing today

37%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P1
    PROJECT 1649 INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $57k · revenue +31%
  • EC
    EVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $54k · revenue +11%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY BLACKHAWK REGION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $50k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys and Girls Clubs of Siouxland Inc

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
2
Chamber of Commerce - Greater Beloit

Chamber of commerce to support, ancourage and engage in activities that make the greater Beloit area a better place to live and do business.

Education
3
Boys & Girls Club of Baldwin and Jones Co Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—
4
Jewish Community Center

The st. louis jewish community center enriches lives, builds community, promotes inclusivity and creates meaningful jewish experiences.

Human Services
5
Jeannette Public Library Assoc

Provides for personal enrichment, cultural programming, education support and life long learning for the citizens of the community and beyond.

Education
6
Boys & Girls Club of Dumplin Valley

Servie the youth of jefferson and cocke county through summer and after school programming to inspire and enable them to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
7
Boys & Girls Club of Chicopee Inc

The organization promotes the health, social, educational, vocational, and character development of young people by providing community services and youth activities throughout the greater chicopee area.

—
8
Boys & Girls Clubs of Harrison County Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
9
Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc

Mission and significant activities to promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in indiana; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and…

—
10
Madison County Childrens Camp Inc

Operation of a residential camp for needy youngsters on a no charge basis

Recreation & Sports
11
Johnson City Public Library

Through both traditional materials and emerging technologies, johnson city public library offers a mulititude of learning opportunities and entertainment choices in a dynamic center for the community.

Education
12
Boys and Girls Clubs of Southern Illinoi

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as caring, productive and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way Blackhawk Region Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Gathering Place of Milton Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PATRICKS CONGREGATION: $104,600 · OtherST PATRICKS CONGREGATIONCOMMUNITY ACTION: $65,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTIONHEALTHNET OF JANESVILLE: $59,000 · OtherHEALTHNET OF JANESVILLEST ELIZABETH'S HOME: $47,500 · OtherST ELIZABETH'S HOMEHOSPICE CARE INC: $43,250 · OtherHOSPICE CARE INCCANCER COALITION OF ROCK COUNTY: $42,000 · OtherCANCER COALITION OF ROCK COUNTYSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF SOUTHERN WI: $37,600 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF SOUTHERN WIST JOHN VIANNEY CONGREGATION: $33,600 · OtherST MARY'S CONGREGATION: $33,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $29,200 · OtherYMCA FRIENDS OF YOUTH: $28,000 · OtherPREGNANCY HELPLINE: $23,300 · Other+10 more: $107,550 · Other+10 moreEVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INC: $54,100 · Human ServicesEVERYONE COOPERATIN…GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $49,500 · Human ServicesGOD IS FAITHFUL TEM…The Gathering Place of Milton Inc: $37,000 · Human ServicesThe Gathering Place…JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC: $29,200 · Human ServicesJANESVILLE COMMUNIT…+1 more: $5,750 · Human ServicesPROJECT 1649 INC: $57,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT 1649…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE INC: $48,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…BADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $5,400 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY BLACKHAWK REGION INC: $50,350 · PhilanthropyJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $14,500 · Arts & CultureBELOIT JANESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$654,700Human Services$175,550Youth Development$110,400Philanthropy$50,350Arts & Culture$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT 1649 INC: $57,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetEVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INC: $54,100 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY BLACKHAWK REGION INC: $50,350 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetGOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $49,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE INC: $48,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetThe Gathering Place of Milton Inc: $37,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetJANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC: $29,200 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $14,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $5,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $5,400 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF WISCONSIN - BADGERLAND COUNCIL INC: $4,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBELOIT JANESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT 1649 INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYONE COOPERATING TO HELP OTHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY BLACKHAWK REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Gathering Place of Milton Inc ↗
  • Who funds JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON ↗
  • Who funds BADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF WISCONSIN - BADGERLAND COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds BELOIT JANESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin IncWI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Kennedy Family Foundation Inc · United Way Blackhawk Region Inc · Jpc Foundation · Seneca Foods Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Janesville Foundation Inc · Barry and Marci Brandt Family Foundation Inc · Hendricks Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William J Cronin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William J Cronin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William J Cronin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William J Cronin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William J Cronin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph