Skip to content

· Private foundation

William H Bowen Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$266kEducation$243kHuman Services$182kHealth$169kReligion$140kRecreation & Sports$78kCrime & Legal$73kPhilanthropy$68kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $215k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UAMS COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$25,000
COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS$25,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$24,000
ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE$24,000
AGE TO AGE WESLEY FOUNDATION$21,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$20,000
AR CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$20,000
CENTRAL ARKANSAS LIBRARY FOUND$20,000
ARKANSAS TECH UNIV FOUNDATION$15,000
WESLEY FOUNDATION ARKANSAS TECH$11,000
ACCESS SCHOOL$10,000
ARKANSAS PUBLIC POLICY PANEL$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK$5,000
ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES$5,000
CAMP ALDERSGATE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $25k → 15%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $15k → 15%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $15k → 15%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $10k → 15%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $9k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 15 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$1.2M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+32%

Still filing today

47%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $261k · revenue +99%
  • AT
    ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +33%
  • CA
    CAMP ALDERSGATE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $78k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • FO
    FOUR OTHER ORGANIZED CHARITIES
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • AS
    Arkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +32%
  • CF
    CALS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families

Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…

Human Services
2
New Generation Inc

Usher in leadership & policies that make arkansas the best place to live, work, and raise a family.

Community Improvement
3
Youth Home Inc

To equip and empower youth, adults, and families to become healthier and contributing members of the community by providing compassionate emotional and behavioral intensive residential treatment & qualified residential treatment for ages…

Health
4
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
5
Opportunity Arkansas Foundation

Renewing the land of opportunity by simplifying government and solving generational problems for the next generation.

Philanthropy
6
Legal Aid of Arkansas

To provide legal assistance & housing counseling to the underprivileged citizens of north arkansas.

Crime & Legal
7
Central Arkansas Development Council

To provide services to low income individuals.

Community Improvement
8
Casa of North Arkansas

The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
9
Ozark Opportunities Inc

To render constructive civic service, including the sponsorship of social, educational, and economic projects for the promotion of the welfare of the community and the citizens of the ozarks situated in baxter, boone, marion, newton,…

Community Improvement
10
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
11
Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Provide help to domestic violence victims and encourage community efforts to promote domestic peace.

—
12
Common Ground Arkansas Inc

Common ground arkansas is an arkansas nonprofit public policy advocacy organization corporation dedicated to educating, equipping, and engaging arkansas citizens and leaders to take action on important economic and legislative issues that…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centers for Youth and Families Inc; the most unlike its peers is Potluck Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $140,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHAGE TO AGE WESLEY FOUNDATION: $116,500 · OtherAGE TO AGE WESLEY FOUNDATIONUAMS COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $113,750 · OtherUAMS COLLEGE OF MEDICINEWESLEY FOUNDATION ARKANSAS TECH: $70,500 · OtherWESLEY FOUNDATION ARKANSAS TECHARK CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $55,000 · OtherARK CHILDREN'S HOSPITALOTHER CHARITIES: $52,500 · OtherOTHER CHARITIESOUR HOUSE INC: $45,250 · OtherOUR HOUSE INCADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $38,500 · Other+7 more: $90,000 · Other+7 moreARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $260,500 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF…+1 more: $5,000 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $117,000 · EducationARKANSAS T…COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $73,250 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesCAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $78,250 · Recreation & SportsARKANSAS PUBLIC POLICY PANEL INC: $43,500 · EnvironmentArkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$722,000Food & Nutrition$265,500Education$117,000Human Services$80,250Recreation & Sports$78,250Environment$43,500Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $260,500 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $117,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCAMP ALDERSGATE INC: $78,250 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $73,250 over 5y, 49% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $45,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetARKANSAS PUBLIC POLICY PANEL INC: $43,500 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetArkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOTLUCK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL ARKANSAS AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP ALDERSGATE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS PUBLIC POLICY PANEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Arkansas Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds POTLUCK INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL ARKANSAS AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Riggs Benevolent Fund · John R & Judy W Fletcher Family Foundation · Heart of Arkansas United Way · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Heflin Family Foundation Trust · Clarence E Anthony Charitable Trust · Brown Foundation · Arkansas Children's Hospital · The Methodist Foundation for Arkansas

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William H Bowen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William H Bowen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William H Bowen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph