Skip to content

· Private foundation

William Guitar Little Charitable Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$197k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$90kAnimals$76kPhilanthropy$61kArts & Culture$45kHealth$36kEnvironment$10kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $101k
$41,225
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY$51,250
LOVE COLUMBIA$50,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS$41,225
BOONE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
BOONE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$25,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%PASCALES PALS INC: $5k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA: $50k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$261k · 6 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$261k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+21%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $76k · revenue +118%
  • LC
    Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia
    2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +60%
  • BC
    BOONE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • RR
    RIVER RELIEF INC D/B/A MISSOURI RIVER RELIEF
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +21%
  • PP
    PASCALE'S PALS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -43%
  • MS
    MISSOURI STATE HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missouri Historical Society

The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…

Arts & Culture
2
Missouri Center for Patient Safety

Center for patient safety seeks to reduce preventable patient harm by improving patient safety culture, working in collaboration with providers, associations and government entities.

Health
3
Boone Area Chamber of Commerce

To enhance the economic vitality and quality of life in boone county

Community Improvement
4
The State Historical Society of Missouri

To collect, preserve, publish, exhibit, and make available material related to all aspects and periods of missouri history. the society also seeks to generate interest in and appreciation of the rich cultural heritage of the state and its…

—
5
St Louis Sports Commission Inc

Foster economic growth and improved quality of life in the st. louis area by producing events, enhancing its national and international image as a premier sports region, and increasing community awareness of the value of sports.

—
6
Columbia Basin Health Association

To provide equal access to quality health care to all persons regardless of age, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or the ability to pay.primary activities: medical, dental, vision and related healthcare services.

Health
7
The Missouri Foundation for Health

To eliminate underlying causes of health inequities, transform systems and enable individuals and communities to thrive

Health
8
Columbia Health Services

Columbia health services exists to improve the health of the people of columbia county.

Health
9
Community Foundation of Central Mo

The community foundation of central missouri inspires and nurtures philanthropy for the public good.

Philanthropy
10
Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commission

As the leading public catalyst for arts and culture in st. louis, the regional arts commission leverages the power of creativity to strengthen and enrich our community.

Arts & Culture
11
Boone Area Humane Society Inc

Ensuring humane treatment of animals and providing animal welfare and control services to boone, boone county and surrounding communities

Animals
12
Medical Society of the District of Colum

Medical society of the district of columbia (msdc) was formed by an act of congress for purposes adjudged most conducive to promoting and disseminating medical and surgical knowledge. the organization dedicates its effort to the well-being…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boone Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pascale's Pals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY: $76,250 · AnimalsCENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SO…Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia: $60,000 · Human ServicesLove Columbia Corp Lov…PASCALE'S PALS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesPASCALE'S PALS INCROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $41,225 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHR…SHOW-ME INSTITUTE: $20,000 · PhilanthropySHOW-ME INSTITUTEBOONE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $45,000 · Arts & CultureBOONE COUNTY HI…BOONE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthBOONE HOSPIT…SALVATION ARMY: $25,000 · OtherSALVATION …MISSOURI STATE HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherMISSOURI S…+1 more: $1,000 · OtherRIVER RELIEF INC D/B/A MISSOURI RIVER RELIEF: $10,000 · Environment
Animals$76,250Human Services$65,000Philanthropy$61,225Arts & Culture$45,000Health$35,000Other$31,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY: $76,250 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia: $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOONE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $45,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $41,225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOONE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSHOW-ME INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetRIVER RELIEF INC D/B/A MISSOURI RIVER RELIEF: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPASCALE'S PALS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMISSOURI STATE HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United FoundationMO15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Boone County Community Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William Guitar Little Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William Guitar Little Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William Guitar Little Charitable Fund?

    Find your warmest path to William Guitar Little Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William Guitar Little’s filings →

    More from the funding graph