Skip to content

· Private foundation

William E Orzolek & Munja Orzolek Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$174kHuman Services$118kReligion$62kMembership Benefit$40kInternational$33kHealth$31kEducation$20kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$942k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENOB INC$12,000
THE KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NY$10,000
KOREAN AMERICAN SPECIAL ED CENTER$10,000
METROPOLITAN OPERA$5,500
JCC MANHATTAN$5,000
UNITED SOUND$5,000
GLOBAL CHILDRENS FDN$5,000
ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND$5,000
AHL FOUNDATION$3,000
JAZZ FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$3,000
DREAM OCHESTRA$3,000
ST JOSEPH FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GLOBAL CHILDRENS FDN: $5k → 10%GLOBAL CHILDRENS FDN: $5k → 10%GLOBAL CHILDRENS FDN: $5k → 10%GLOBAL CHILDRENS FDN: $5k → 10%GLOBAL CHILDRENS FDN: $5k → 10%GLOBAL CHILDRENS FDN: $3k → 10%GLOBAL CHILDRENS FDN: $3k → 10%GLOBAL CHILDRENS FDN: $2k → 10%GLOBAL CHILDRENS FDN: $500 → 10%JCC MANHATTAN: $10k → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $10k → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $10k → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $7k → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $5k → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $5k → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $5k → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $5k → 17%JCC MANHATTAN: $5k → 17%YOUNG ADULTS INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$476k · 17 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +67% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$476k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+67%

Still filing today

59%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthMembership BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    ENOB INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +80%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +6%
  • TA
    THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • NF
    NEXT FOR AUTISM INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -20%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • YA
    YOUNG ADULT INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Jazz Education Network

The jazz education network is dedicated to building the jazz arts community by advancing education, promoting performance, and developing new audiences.

Arts & Culture
3
The Midori Foundation Inc

Midori & friends harnesses the power of music to transform the lives of children and enrich their communities.

—
4
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
5
Sing for Hope Inc

Sing for hope harnesses the power of the arts to create a better world. our creative programs bring hope, healing, and connection to millions of people in hospitals, schools, care facilities, and public spaces worldwide. a non-profit…

Arts & Culture
6
The New York Festival of Song Inc

NYFOS is dedicated to creating intimate song concerts of great beauty and originality, weaving music, poetry, history and humor into unforgettable evenings of compelling theater, entertaining, educating and creating community among…

—
7
Jazz At Lincoln Center Inc

The mission of jazz at lincoln center, inc. is to entertain, enrich and expand a global community for jazz through performance, education and advocacy. jazz at lincoln center, fosters appreciation of jazz as an art form, (continued on…

Arts & Culture
8
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture
9
Elaine Kaufman Cultural Center Lucy Moses School for Music and Dance

Kaufman music center stimulates appreciation of and participation in music through music performance and education in ways that awaken creativity, advance innovation, and create a sense of wonder among performers, students, teachers, and…

Arts & Culture
10
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
11
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
12
New World Symphony Inc

Prepares gifted graduates of prestigious music programs for successful careers in orchestras and ensembles.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Actors' Fund of America; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOREAN AMERICAN SPECIAL ED CENTER: $30,000 · OtherKOREAN AMERICAN SPECIAL ED C…D'ADDARIO FOUNDATION: $24,000 · OtherD'ADDARIO FOUNDATIONTHE KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NY: $20,000 · OtherTHE KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICE…ST JOSEPH FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherST JOSEPH FOUNDATIONST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $8,500 · OtherST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATIONMETROPOLITAN OPERA: $5,500 · OtherYAI: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+4 more: $8,000 · Other+4 moreENOB INC: $103,500 · Arts & CultureENOB INCDREAM ORCHESTRA INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureDREAM ORCHESTRA INCTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $62,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY C…GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDA…+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesAHL FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 · EducationAHL FOUNDATION…New York University: $20,000 · EducationNew York Unive…UNITED SOUND INC: $17,000 · EducationUNITED SOUND I…THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $54,600 · Membership BenefitTHE ACTORS' …FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN'S CANCER: $13,000 · HealthNEXT FOR AUTISM INC: $5,000 · HealthJazz Foundation of America Inc: $16,000 · Philanthropy
Other$124,000Arts & Culture$123,500Human Services$98,000Education$64,500Membership Benefit$54,600Health$18,000Philanthropy$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENOB INC: $103,500 over 9y, 13% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $62,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $54,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetAHL FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetNew York University: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM ORCHESTRA INC: $20,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED SOUND INC: $17,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetJazz Foundation of America Inc: $16,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN'S CANCER: $13,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEXT FOR AUTISM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG ADULT INSTITUTE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENOB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AHL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds DREAM ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Jazz Foundation of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN'S CANCER ↗
  • Who funds NEXT FOR AUTISM INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG ADULT INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William E Orzolek & Munja Orzolek Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William E Orzolek & Munja Orzolek Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William E Orzolek & Munja Orzolek’s filings →

    More from the funding graph