Skip to content

· Private foundation

William & Martha Ford Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
65
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$2.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.8MArts & Culture$1.3MHuman Services$612kReligion$472kEducation$281kEnvironment$122kYouth Development$58kRecreation & Sports$51kOther$0
02FY2024 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k50 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $301k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.6M
$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$672k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$2,150,000
THE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$500,000
CHRIST CHURCH GROSSE POINTE$101,000
THE HENRY FORD$100,000
DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS$50,000
OUR LADY OF THE ELMS SCHOOL$50,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$25,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
FREEDOM INSTITUTE$10,000
CATCH$10,000
HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST$10,000
RACQUET UP DETROIT$10,000
DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$10,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%POPE FRANCIS CENTER: $5k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%CAMP CASEY: $1k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%CAMP CASEY: $1k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%CAMP CASEY: $1k → 8%POPE FRANCIS CENTER: $500 → 21%CAMP CASEY: $1k → 8%THE ROCKET GIVING FUND: $500 → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%CAMP CASEY: $1k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $1k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $1k → 8%CAMP CASEY: $1k → 8%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $5k → 21%FOCUSHOPE: $5k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $5k → 21%FOCUSHOPE: $5k → 21%SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS: $10k → 21%SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS - THE HELM: $10k → 21%SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS: $10k → 21%THE FAMILY CENTER OF GROSSE POINTE & HARPER WOODS: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 95 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

95 repeat relationships: 57 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
38

Total granted

$6.6M
$320k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+24%

Still filing today

67%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +69%
  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $207k · revenue +46%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue -70%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -5%
  • SC
    SCHAAP CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

—
2
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

—
3
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

—
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Russ Thomas Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/88
Grantees still filing
69/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $3,128,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Health+18 more: $340,500 · Health+18 moreTHE HENRY FORD: $804,100 · OtherTHE HENRY FORDTHE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $503,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONCHRIST CHURCH GROSSE POINTE: $455,927 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH GROSSE POINTEOUR LADY OF THE ELMS SCHOOL: $100,000 · Other+81 more: $702,794 · Other+81 moreTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $206,500 · Arts & CultureHENRY FORD ESTATE: $100,000 · Arts & CultureGROSSE POINTE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $29,500 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $23,950 · Arts & CultureThe Trustees of Princeton University: $120,000 · EducationDETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION: $18,000 · EducationCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $10,000 · EducationGROSSE POINTE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8,000 · Education+8 more: $24,200 · EducationRACQUET UP DETROIT: $51,000 · Recreation & SportsDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC: $27,500 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsGARDEN CLUB OF MICHIGAN INC: $53,000 · EnvironmentTHE GREENING OF DETROIT: $27,500 · EnvironmentCHANDLER PARK CONSERVANCY: $5,000 · Environment+3 more: $4,000 · EnvironmentJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $50,000 · PhilanthropyHOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $24,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Health$3,618,500Other$2,565,821Arts & Culture$359,950Education$188,200Recreation & Sports$95,500Environment$89,500Philanthropy$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $3,128,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $206,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM INSTITUTE INC: $120,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHENRY FORD ESTATE: $100,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $68,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGARDEN CLUB OF MICHIGAN INC: $53,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetRACQUET UP DETROIT: $51,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $37,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER: $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGROSSE POINTE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $29,500 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC: $27,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREENING OF DETROIT: $27,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMACKINAC CENTER: $27,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEAST HAMPTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTAU BETA ASSOCIATION: $18,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBELLE ISLE CONSERVANCY: $17,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFOCUSHOPE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROSSE POINTE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP CASEY CORPORATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetDETROIT ARTISTS MARKET: $8,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOLD NEWSBOYS GOODFELLOW FUND OF DETROIT MICHIGAN: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF EAST HAMPTON INC: $8,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetRACING FOR KIDS: $7,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFESTIVAL OF TREES INC: $7,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGROSSE POINTE FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION: $6,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetEAST HAMPTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $6,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIGAN UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPOPE FRANCIS CENTER: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD ESTATE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN CLUB OF MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREENING OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EAST HAMPTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TAU BETA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BELLE ISLE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSHOPE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI47.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · St Clair Charitable Trust · Lynn & Paul Alandt Foundation · Hudson-Webber Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Ethel and James Flinn Foundation · McGregor Fund · Ford Philanthropy · Alice Kales Hartwick Foundation · Benson & Edith Ford Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William & Martha Ford Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William & Martha Ford Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William & Martha Ford Fund?

Find your warmest path to William & Martha Ford Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 140 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William & Martha Ford’s filings →

More from the funding graph