Skip to content

· Private foundation

William & Joan Edmonds Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$153k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$266kArts & Culture$196kEducation$79kHealth$75kHuman Services$39kCommunity Improvement$33kSocial Science$30kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL MISSION$70,000
INDEPENDENT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$23,000
HABITAT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS$13,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$10,000
NEW CITY SCHOOL$5,000
KIRKWOOD BY THE RIVER$5,000
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$5,000
JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL$5,000
PEDAL THE CAUSE$5,000
READY READERS$5,000
GLEN ECHO HISTORIC DISTRICT PRESERVATION$5,000
SPECIAL EQUESTRIANS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SPECIAL EQUESTRAINS: $2k → 7%SPECIAL EQUESTRAINS: $2k → 7%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $29k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $25k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $8k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
IA
PA
MO
VA
TN
NC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$736k · 21 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$736k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+79%

Still filing today

48%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PT
    PEDAL THE CAUSE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $67k · revenue +31%
  • RR
    READY READERS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $34k · revenue +148%
  • KI
    KIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $28k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • GR
    Great Rivers Environmental Law Centergraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +79%
  • SP
    ST PATRICK CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
2
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
3
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
4
Cedar Valley United Way

Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.

Philanthropy
5
Direct Center for Independence Inc

Mission Advocated disability voice, choice, and independenceVision Universal access and justice

Human Services
6
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
7
Stride Inc

To educate and empower individuals with special needs in life-changing sport and recreation

—
8
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
9
United Way of San Diego County

To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.

Philanthropy
10
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
11
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
12
Waterstep Inc

Waterstep focuses on providing safe water, sanitation, and hygiene solutions to communities in need around the world. its mission is rooted in the belief that safe water is a basic human right and a critical foundation for health,…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in the Middle Inc; the most unlike its peers is Special Equestrians Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILLIAM & JOAN EDMONDS FOUNDATION: $160,000 · OtherWILLIAM & JOAN EDMONDS FOUNDATIONALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL MISSION: $102,000 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL MISSIONINDEPENDENT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $101,000 · OtherINDEPENDENT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHINDEPENDENT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $63,000 · OtherINDEPENDENT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherKIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC: $27,600 · OtherThe New City School Inc: $20,000 · Other+7 more: $74,400 · Other+7 morePEDAL THE CAUSE: $66,500 · Human ServicesPEDAL THE …Special Equestrians Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesSpecial Eq…READY READERS: $33,500 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $15,000 · EducationLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationHABITAT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS: $21,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $10,000 · PhilanthropyGreat Rivers Environmental Law Center: $6,000 · Crime & LegalSpecial Equestrians Inc: $4,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$578,000Human Services$70,500Education$58,500Community Improvement$21,000Philanthropy$20,000Crime & Legal$6,000Recreation & Sports$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $66,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetREADY READERS: $33,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetKIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC: $27,600 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS: $21,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetThe New City School Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Rivers Environmental Law Center: $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $5,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Equestrians Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSpecial Equestrians Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds READY READERS ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS ↗
  • Who funds The New City School Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds LINVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds Great Rivers Environmental Law Center ↗
  • Who funds ST PATRICK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Special Equestrians Inc ↗
  • Who funds Special Equestrians Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William & Joan Edmonds Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William & Joan Edmonds Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William & Joan Edmonds’ filings →

    More from the funding graph