Skip to content

· Private foundation

Willard J and Alice C Corbett Char Tr

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.8M
Granted FY2020
12
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$808k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Philanthropy$1.3MHealth$1.1MHuman Services$1.1MYouth Development$829kEducation$720kFood & Nutrition$216k
02FY2020 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.8M
$336,557
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER$807,931
UNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY$673,599
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$673,114
KIWANIS CLUB (DOWNTOWN CLUB)$505,320
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN IL$505,320
ST ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER$336,557
ROCKFORD BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUBS ASSN$269,634
SWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION$235,687
MERCY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$235,687
ILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES INC$202,225
LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$202,225
KEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER$202,225
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%KIWANIS CLUB (DOWNTOWN CLUB): $505k → 9%UNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $674k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $673k → 19%KIWANIS CLUB (DOWNTOWN CLUB): $35k → 9%MERCY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $236k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $47k → 19%UNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $47k → 15%MERCY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $16k → 15%ST ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER: $337k → 15%ST ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER: $23k → 15%ILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES INC: $202k → 15%KEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER: $202k → 15%ILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES INC: $14k → 15%KEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER: $14k → 15%NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER: $808k → 15%LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $202k → 15%NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER: $56k → 15%LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $14k → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN IL: $505k → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN IL: $35k → 15%SWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $236k → 15%SWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $16k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$4.6M
$0

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
PhilanthropyFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MD
    MERCYHEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $252k · revenue +357%
  • LC
    LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $216k · revenue +35%
  • KC
    KEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $216k · revenue +50% · 98% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Rockford Regional Health Council

    Rockford regional health council is a not-for-profit social service corporation organized under the laws of the state of illinois for the purpose of improving community health through data gatering and analysis, education and advocacy.

    —
    2
    Industrial Council of Nearwest Chicago

    Strengthen companies in the kinzie industrial corridor and facilitate economic and community development by providing services and incubator space.

    —
    3
    North Shore Health Care Foundation

    To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

    Health
    4
    Northern Illinois Center for Nonprofit Excellence

    To support not for profit organizations in innovation, excellence and leadership in their communities.

    Community Improvement
    5
    Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

    Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

    Health
    6
    Kishwaukee United Way

    To improve lives by sharing community resources

    Philanthropy
    7
    United Way of North Central Iowa

    Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

    Philanthropy
    8
    Rockford Bell Credit Union

    Rockford Bell Credit Union is a member owned community credit union chartered by the state. We are dedicated to providing quality financial service for our membership.

    —
    9
    Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency Inc

    To improve the quality of life by providing resources and services within our communities.

    Human Services
    10
    Northwestern Il Area Agency On Aging

    To enable older persons to live in dignity and independence.

    —
    11
    Northwest Community Healthcare

    NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…

    Health
    12
    Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

    The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Community Center; the most unlike its peers is St Anthony Medical Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    4/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER: $863,908 · OtherNORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTERUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $719,761 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISKIWANIS CLUB (DOWNTOWN CLUB): $540,305 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB (DOWNTOWN CLUB)St Anthony Medical Center Inc: $359,881 · OtherSt Anthony Medical Center IncROCKFORD BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUBS ASSN: $288,293 · OtherROCKFORD BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUBS ASSNSWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $252,014 · OtherSWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATIONILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES: $216,219 · OtherILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISESUNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $720,246 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEYCommunity Foundation of Northern IL: $540,305 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Northern …MERCYHEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $252,014 · PhilanthropyMERCYHEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIO…LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $216,219 · Food & NutritionKEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $216,219 · Community Improvement
    Other$3,240,381Philanthropy$1,512,565Food & Nutrition$216,219Community Improvement$216,219

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $720,246 over 2y, 13% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northern IL: $540,305 over 2y, 11% of budgetLIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $216,219 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetKEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $216,219 over 2y, 98% of budgetILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES: $216,219 over 2y, 63% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Sjostrom & Sons FoundationIL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Sjostrom & Sons Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern IL · The Chicago Community Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Willard J and Alice C Corbett Char Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willard J and Alice C Corbett Char Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Willard J and Alice C Corbett Char Tr’s filings →

      More from the funding graph