Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Willard J and Alice C Corbett Char Tr

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.8M
Granted FY2020
12
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$808k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192020.

Philanthropy$1.3MHealth$1.1MHuman Services$1.1MYouth Development$829kEducation$720kFood & Nutrition$216k
02FY2020 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.8M
$336,557
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER$807,931
UNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY$673,599
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$673,114
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN IL$505,320
KIWANIS CLUB (DOWNTOWN CLUB)$505,320
ST ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER$336,557
ROCKFORD BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUBS ASSN$269,634
SWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION$235,687
MERCY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$235,687
KEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER$202,225
LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$202,225
ILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES INC$202,225
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%KIWANIS CLUB (DOWNTOWN CLUB): $505k → 9%UNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $674k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $673k → 19%KIWANIS CLUB (DOWNTOWN CLUB): $35k → 9%MERCY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $236k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $47k → 19%UNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $47k → 15%MERCY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $16k → 15%ST ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER: $337k → 15%ST ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER: $23k → 15%ILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES INC: $202k → 15%KEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER: $202k → 15%ILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES INC: $14k → 15%KEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER: $14k → 15%NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER: $808k → 15%LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $202k → 15%NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER: $56k → 15%LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $14k → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN IL: $505k → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN IL: $35k → 15%SWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $236k → 15%SWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $16k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$4.6M
$0

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
PhilanthropyFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MD
    MERCYHEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $252k · revenue +357%
  • LC
    LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $216k · revenue +29%
  • KC
    KEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $216k · revenue +50% · 98% of their budget

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Rockford Regional Health Council

    Rockford regional health council is a not-for-profit social service corporation organized under the laws of the state of illinois for the purpose of improving community health through data gatering and analysis, education and advocacy.

    2
    Industrial Council of Nearwest Chicago

    Strengthen companies in the kinzie industrial corridor and facilitate economic and community development by providing services and incubator space.

    3
    North Shore Health Care Foundation

    To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

    Health
    4
    Northern Illinois Center for Nonprofit Excellence

    To support not for profit organizations in innovation, excellence and leadership in their communities.

    Community Improvement
    5
    Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

    Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

    Health
    6
    Kishwaukee United Way

    To improve lives by sharing community resources

    Philanthropy
    7
    United Way of North Central Iowa

    Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

    Philanthropy
    8
    Rockford Bell Credit Union

    Rockford Bell Credit Union is a member owned community credit union chartered by the state. We are dedicated to providing quality financial service for our membership.

    9
    Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency Inc

    To improve the quality of life by providing resources and services within our communities.

    Human Services
    10
    Northwestern Il Area Agency On Aging

    To enable older persons to live in dignity and independence.

    11
    Northwest Community Healthcare

    NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…

    Health
    12
    Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

    The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Community Center and the most unlike its peers is St Anthony Medical Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    4/7
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER — $863,908 · OtherNORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTERUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $719,761 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISKIWANIS CLUB (DOWNTOWN CLUB) — $540,305 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB (DOWNTOWN CLUB)St Anthony Medical Center Inc — $359,881 · OtherSt Anthony Medical Center IncROCKFORD BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUBS ASSN — $288,293 · OtherROCKFORD BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUBS ASSNSWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $252,014 · OtherSWEDISH AMERICAN MEDICAL FOUNDATIONILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES — $216,219 · OtherILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISESUNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY — $720,246 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEYCommunity Foundation of Northern IL — $540,305 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Northern …MERCYHEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $252,014 · PhilanthropyMERCYHEALTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIO…LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $216,219 · Food & NutritionKEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $216,219 · Community Improvement
    Other$3,240,381Philanthropy$1,512,565Food & Nutrition$216,219Community Improvement$216,219

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY — $720,246 over 2y, 13% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northern IL — $540,305 over 2y, 11% of budgetLIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $216,219 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetKEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $216,219 over 2y, 98% of budgetILLINOIS GROWTH ENTERPRISES — $216,219 over 2y, 63% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Sjostrom & Sons FoundationIL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Sjostrom & Sons Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern IL · The Chicago Community Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Willard J and Alice C Corbett Char Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph