Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wih and Lula E Pitts Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$28MHuman Services$4.1MReligion$3.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$693kInternational$650kHealth$520kHousing & Shelter$100k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $939k
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.2M
$249,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$52M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANDREW COLLEGE$1,242,936
LAGRANGE COLLEGE$1,042,936
WESLEYAN COLLEGE$515,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY CHANDLER SCHOOL$440,000
GAMMON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$375,000
EPWORTH BY THE SEA$300,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$250,000
METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH$249,000
REINHARDT UNIVERSITY$200,000
YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE$150,000
THE VASHTI CENTER INC$100,000
OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE$100,000
WESLEY GLEN MINISTRIES$70,000
ST JOHN-PITTS MEMORIAL CHRISTIAN$69,700
MURPHY-HARPST CHILDRENS CENTERS INC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $630k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SAVANNAH IN: $75k → 16%OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE: $100k → 18%MAGNOLIA MANOR: $50k → 22%OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE: $100k → 18%MAGNOLIA MANOR: $50k → 22%OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE: $50k → 18%OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE: $50k → 18%OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE: $50k → 18%OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE: $45k → 18%OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE: $35k → 18%OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36M · 17 repeat orgs$843k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$36M
$453k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
0%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $390k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ANDREW COLLEGE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8.5M · revenue +58%
  • WC
    WESLEYAN COLLEGE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +34%
  • EB
    Epworth By The Sea Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • EH
    EMORY HEALTHCARE
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • U
    UMCOR
    one grant, 2024 · $128k
  • WC
    WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
2
Gardner-Webb University

The university statement of values consists of christian heritage, baptist heritage, academic excellence, liberal arts, teamwork, a student-centered focus, community engagement and diversity.

Education
3
Welch College

Welch college is a christian higher education institution that educates leaders to serve christ, his church, and his world through biblical thought and life

Education
4
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
5
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
6
Eckerd College

The mission of eckerd college is to provide excellent innovative undergraduate liberal arts education and lifelong learning programs in the unique florida environment, within the context of a covenant relationship with the presbyterian…

Education
7
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
8
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
9
Wesley Biblical Seminary

Wesley biblical seminary is a multi-denominational school of theology that provides undergraduate, graduate and doctorate level education for individuals who are preparing for christian service.

Education
10
Emmanuel College

Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.

Education
11
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
12
Methodist University Inc

The purpose of methodist university is to provide an undergraduate and graduate education firmly grounded in the liberal arts tradition, that nurtures moral values & ethical decision-making; to provide distinctive professional & graduate…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reinhardt University; the most unlike its peers is Emory University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANDREW COLLEGE: $8,543,488 · EducationANDREW COLLEGELaGrange College: $8,343,488 · EducationLaGrange CollegeWESLEYAN COLLEGE: $2,977,375 · EducationWESLEYAN COLLEGEREINHARDT UNIVERSITY: $1,450,000 · EducationREINHARDT UNIVERSITYYOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE: $1,175,000 · EducationEmory University: $1,000,000 · EducationEMORY UNIVERSITY CHANDLER SCHOOL: $4,270,000 · OtherEMORY UNIVERSITY CHANDLER SCHOO…METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH: $2,785,000 · OtherMETHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN & Y…GENERAL BOARD OF GLOBAL MINISTRIES: $850,000 · OtherGENERAL BOARD OF GLOBAL MINISTR…UNITED METHODIST COMMITTEE ON RELIEF: $565,000 · OtherUNITED METHODIST COMMITTEE ON R…THE UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $462,500 · OtherGAMMON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $375,000 · Other+6 more: $1,082,700 · Other+6 moreEpworth By The Sea Inc: $2,660,000 · ReligionOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $455,000 · Human ServicesMagnolia Manor Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesWESLEY COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $75,000 · Human Services
Education$23,489,351Other$10,390,200Religion$2,660,000Human Services$630,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANDREW COLLEGE: $8,543,488 over 8y, 11% of budgetLaGrange College: $8,343,488 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetWESLEYAN COLLEGE: $2,977,375 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetEpworth By The Sea Inc: $2,660,000 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetREINHARDT UNIVERSITY: $1,450,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE: $1,175,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetEmory University: $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $455,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetGAMMON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $375,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWesley Glen Ministries Inc: $255,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetMagnolia Manor Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEY COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $75,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetMURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDREW COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LaGrange College ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Epworth By The Sea Inc ↗
  • Who funds REINHARDT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GAMMON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds Wesley Glen Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Magnolia Manor Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Georgia Power Foundation IncGA19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · St Marys Methodist Church Foundation I · Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Georgia Independent College Association Inc · Clark and Ruby Baker Foundation · Beloco Foundation Inc · Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · Frances Wood Wilson Foundation Inc · Soma Foundation Inc · Tr Lois & Lucy Lampkin Fdn Ua · Georgia Humanities Council Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wih and Lula E Pitts Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wih and Lula E Pitts Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wih and Lula E Pitts Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wih and Lula E Pitts Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wih and Lula E Pitts’ filings →

    More from the funding graph