Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Whole Kids Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.2M
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Food & Nutrition$7.9MEnvironment$716kHealth$59kPhilanthropy$50kCommunity Improvement$50kEducation$30kArts & Culture$11kYouth Development$9kOther$0
02FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $4,101,235 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,209,082 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $107,847 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $158k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $342k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.6M
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOOL GARDEN GRANTS$1,775,107
CHEF ANN FOUNDATION$995,454
WCF Fresh Health Food Access$826,686
THE BEE CAUSE PROJECT$232,450
PEAS$60,000
Youth Farm$50,000
Slow Food USA$32,000
NOPI-Nonprofit Incubator$25,000
Urban Strategies, Inc$25,000
Tides Center$25,000
The University of Texas at Austin$20,000
SCHOOL GARDEN REVIEW PROCESS$16,160
Wellness in the Schools$14,885
Zenger Farm$3,000
Deep Roots Garden$493
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.7M · 8 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +131% since the first grant, against -37% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$7.7M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+131%
-37%

Still filing today

50%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $171k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
EducationHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHEF ANN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2.0M · revenue ×15
  • TB
    THE BEE CAUSE PROJECT INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $716k · revenue +52% · 49% of their budget
  • WI
    WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $59k · revenue +131%

Funded once

  • WF
    WCF Fresh Healthy Food Access
    one grant, 2021 · $768k
  • SF
    School Food Matters
    one grant, 2022 · $178k
  • YF
    Youth Farm and Market Project
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -68%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Action

Our mission is to educate, organize and advocate for food and farming systems to become economically prosperous, ecologically sound and socially equitable.

2
Food Connects

To cultivate healthy farm and food connections in classrooms, cafeterias, and communities.

Food & Nutrition
3
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

4
Whole Kids Foundation
5
Turning Green

To educate and inpspire young adults to promote environmentally conscious & socially responsible choices.

Health
6
Real Food for Kids

Real Food for Kids' mission is to change eating behaviors and improve health outcomes for children and families in the Greater Washington Region through sustainable access to real whole foods, impactful nutrition education, and local…

Youth Development
7
Equitable Food Initiative

EFIs mission is to transform the produce industry and the lives of farmworkers by facilitating collaboration among workers, agricultural employers, retail buyers and consumer advocates.

Human Services
8
Kids in Nutrition

Kids In Nutrition (KIN) is a nationwide student-led movement dedicated to food justice, sustainable systems, and improved health outcomes for youth through food literacy and access. Recognizing that lifelong habits develop early, KIN…

Food & Nutrition
9
Eat Real Certified Inc

We empower food service programs and school districts to make food delicious, nourishing, and responsible through our evidence-based certification program. We provide education and support that inspires students, schools, and communities…

Public Benefit
10
Foodcorps Inc

Together with communities, foodcorps serves to connect kids to healthy food in schools.

Food & Nutrition
11
Foundation for Food & Farm Connections

The Foundation for Food and Farm Connections is a 501c3 nonprofit, dedicated to sharing the farm and nutrition story in schools, while promoting local farm sourcing in the cafeteria. To empower kids with knowledge for food systems and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Grow Dat Youth Farm

Our mission is to nurture a diverse group of young leaders through the meaningful work of growing food.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Farm and Market Project and the most unlike its peers is The Edible Schoolyard Project dba the Alice Waters Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHOOL GARDEN GRANTS — $3,260,107 · OtherSCHOOL GARDEN GRANTSWCF Fresh Health Food Access — $1,469,825 · OtherWCF Fresh Health Food AccessWCF Fresh Healthy Food Access — $768,418 · OtherWCF Fresh Healthy Food Access+12 more — $591,889 · Other+12 moreCHEF ANN FOUNDATION — $2,007,873 · EducationCHEF ANN FOUNDATIONTHE BEE CAUSE PROJECT INC — $715,968 · EducationTHE BEE CAUSE PROJECT INC+2 more — $25,000 · EducationWELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC — $58,885 · HealthTIDES CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesROOTS FOR THE HOME TEAM — $45,000 · Food & Nutrition100cameras — $9,200 · Youth Development
Other$6,090,239Education$2,748,841Health$58,885Human Services$50,000Food & Nutrition$45,000Youth Development$9,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHEF ANN FOUNDATION — $2,007,873 over 3y, 22% of budgetTHE BEE CAUSE PROJECT INC — $715,968 over 3y, 49% of budgetWELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC — $58,885 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Farm and Market Project — $50,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetROOTS FOR THE HOME TEAM — $45,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget100cameras — $9,200 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHEF ANN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BEE CAUSE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER
  • Who funds Youth Farm and Market Project
  • Who funds ROOTS FOR THE HOME TEAM
  • Who funds The Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute
  • Who funds CHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds 100cameras

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Whole Foods Market FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Whole Foods Market Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Whole Kids Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Whole Kids Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph